2004
DOI: 10.1051/vetres:2004037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of PCR for routine identification of species of the Mycoplasma mycoides cluster in ruminants

Abstract: -DNA amplification techniques offer considerable promise for the identification of Mycoplasma mycoides cluster members. They avoid antigenic cross-reactivity and variability that hamper serological methods. Many sets of primers, specific of these different members and of Mycoplasma putrefaciens, have been proposed. To assess the reliability of some of these PCR tests in routine laboratory diagnostic use, 230 field strains supposed to belong to this group were simultaneously identified by PCR and an antigenic m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
1
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
(36 reference statements)
0
19
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, to identify these species easily, important efforts have been made over the past decades to develop diagnostic tools that rely on the antigenic (9, 10) and molecular identification of isolates, mainly based on PCR assays (7,(11)(12)(13)(14). Nevertheless, the identification of certain mycoplasmas, such as subspecies belonging to the Mycoplasma mycoides cluster, comprising several important ruminant pathogens that are closely related both antigenically and genetically, has remained problematic (15,16). Although genes encoding 16S rRNA have long been the usual targets for universal PCRs followed by sequence or amplicon analysis (17,18), species-specific PCRs targeting 16S rRNA or other housekeeping genes are often favored because the techniques are more rapid and do not require a specialized laboratory (for reviews, see references 12 and 7).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, to identify these species easily, important efforts have been made over the past decades to develop diagnostic tools that rely on the antigenic (9, 10) and molecular identification of isolates, mainly based on PCR assays (7,(11)(12)(13)(14). Nevertheless, the identification of certain mycoplasmas, such as subspecies belonging to the Mycoplasma mycoides cluster, comprising several important ruminant pathogens that are closely related both antigenically and genetically, has remained problematic (15,16). Although genes encoding 16S rRNA have long been the usual targets for universal PCRs followed by sequence or amplicon analysis (17,18), species-specific PCRs targeting 16S rRNA or other housekeeping genes are often favored because the techniques are more rapid and do not require a specialized laboratory (for reviews, see references 12 and 7).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This cluster includes six taxa, which are phylogenetically closely related based on their 16S rRNA gene sequences (21); present similar serological patterns associated with important intertaxon cross-reactivity (12); and, consequently, are difficult to differentiate. Four taxa contain pathogens for small ruminants, with three, namely, M. mycoides subsp.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…mycoides biotype Small Colony (20,28) and M. capricolum subsp. capripneumoniae (27) are available, but the accurate identification of the remaining taxa of the M. mycoides cluster is more problematic because of intertaxon cross-reactivity and high intrataxon variability (12). Two direct PCR assays currently are proposed in the literature for the specific identification of M. capricolum subsp.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Além disso, a PCR-REA é considerada específica para detectar este grupo em amostras de campo, contudo, a PCR-REA não se presta à diferenciação de subespécies do grupo, exceto a cepa MmmSC, sendo um método de escolha para o diagnóstico da CBPP e triagem do GMM, em áreas com suspeita. Estes achados estão de acordo com estudos prévios de Pettersson et al (1996a) (Le Grand et al 2004). Persson et al (1999a) ressaltaram que a detecção de M.mycoides SC após restrição de amplicons possui uma sensibilidade técnica estimada em 30 cópias de DNA por reação de amplificação.…”
Section: Resultados Isolamento E Identificaçãounclassified