2004
DOI: 10.1002/cc.156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of online education: Policies, practices, and recommendations

Abstract: Online education has become deeply embedded in the offerings of most community colleges. This chapter discusses the challenges, models, and approaches to conducting assessment of student online learning and establishing outcomes for online education.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On one hand, the interactions between instructor and students were analyzed during the entire project duration (12 weeks), using the indicators frequency, and content as well as methodological differences between the two schools. At that time, the exchanges between students were studied by taking into account different processes, which are acknowledged to be signs for high performance teams, explicitly effective communication, positive interrelationships, self-reflection, goal setting, and commitment (Milam, Voorhees Bedard-Voorhees, 2004;McLoughlin, 2002). For this, students have been qualitatively interviewed by mail at the end of the project about their opinion with respect to it, the encountered difficulties as well as positive outcomes (Tseng, Ku, Akarasriworn, 2013).…”
Section: Assessment Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On one hand, the interactions between instructor and students were analyzed during the entire project duration (12 weeks), using the indicators frequency, and content as well as methodological differences between the two schools. At that time, the exchanges between students were studied by taking into account different processes, which are acknowledged to be signs for high performance teams, explicitly effective communication, positive interrelationships, self-reflection, goal setting, and commitment (Milam, Voorhees Bedard-Voorhees, 2004;McLoughlin, 2002). For this, students have been qualitatively interviewed by mail at the end of the project about their opinion with respect to it, the encountered difficulties as well as positive outcomes (Tseng, Ku, Akarasriworn, 2013).…”
Section: Assessment Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Getting all the students connected to the Internet is one of the substantial barriers (Cutri and Whiting, 2018). Though Internet connectivity is vital for continuing online education, many people worldwide cannot have it (Milam et al ., 2004).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such an attempt is illustrated in figure 2 (Miliam et al, 2004). Besides, this article would not have been possible without the feedback offered by students at the end of each course.…”
Section: Conclusion and Future Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%