2018
DOI: 10.7494/geom.2018.12.2.19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Observation Network and State of Exploration as to Groundwater Dynamics within Ukrainian Hydrogeological Province of Dnieper River

Abstract: Abstract:In order to restart the state hydrogeological network and adhere it to European standards in the shortest possible terms, the following top-priority tasks shall be performed: an inventory of the observation stations, assessment of their representativeness, development of the concept for the monitoring system reformation, as well as creation of a single database with GIS-technologies. To solve the abovementioned tasks, we have carried out a geoinformation analyses concerning the locations of ground wat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The water exchange basins, sizes and boundaries of which are determined by sizes and configuration of the river basins as a rule, should be considered as characteristic systems with homogenous regime in forecasting changes in level of the ground water, that is a part of underground hydrosphere the most closely related to the external surface factors forming the groundwater recharge and discharge. The expediency of monitoring study for both surface and underground water is also confirmed by synchronicity of the long-term variability of the mid-annual surface water flow and the annual average depth of the groundwater level (Davybida & Kuzmenko 2018). The studied territory belongs to the hydrogeological province of the Danube River, which coincides territorially with the hydrogeological district of the Tisza River (B-1) within the studied region.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 54%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The water exchange basins, sizes and boundaries of which are determined by sizes and configuration of the river basins as a rule, should be considered as characteristic systems with homogenous regime in forecasting changes in level of the ground water, that is a part of underground hydrosphere the most closely related to the external surface factors forming the groundwater recharge and discharge. The expediency of monitoring study for both surface and underground water is also confirmed by synchronicity of the long-term variability of the mid-annual surface water flow and the annual average depth of the groundwater level (Davybida & Kuzmenko 2018). The studied territory belongs to the hydrogeological province of the Danube River, which coincides territorially with the hydrogeological district of the Tisza River (B-1) within the studied region.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…The second is based on the assessment of conditions and factors for the groundwater formation and their regime, zoning of the territory taking into account different principles and the placement of regime monitoring points within typical areas. Using modern techniques (GIS) that allows effective combining of these approaches, operatively testing and evaluating various variants of the monitoring network within any territorial units (Davybida & Kuzmenko, 2018). Also, it should be noted that the European Union Water Framework Directive provides only a platform and recommendations for managing transboundary water resources.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ukraine is often referred to as the breadbasket of Europe, with 80.0% of its water resources coming from the Dnieper River Basin (Davybida & Kuzmenko, 2018). Pumping groundwater for agricultural irrigation and industrial water use may be the primary reason for groundwater loss (Figure S3 in Supporting Information S1).…”
Section: Eurasiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The new groundwater resources management concept (in conformity with updated water legislation) focuses on the cycle of strategies and measures adoption, launched from the groundwater body identification and delineation procedure and expired by groundwater body status assessment (good or bad) and further appropriate measures development, aimed in groundwater body state restoration, if necessary. It is clear, that the status assessment reliability substantially depends on the appropriately and opti-mally designed monitoring program (Shestopalov, 2016;Davybida, 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%