1995
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)91479-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of numeric abnormalities of X, Y, 18, and 16 chromosomes in preimplantation human embryos before transfer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
55
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
55
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These abnormalities may affect the viability of postimplantation embryos or result in abnormal fetuses. Munne et al(1995) indicated that aged female has a much higher proportion of embryos with normal appearance but abnormal genes, especially chromosomal aneuploidies, compared with younger ones. As we know, motor proteins and protein kinases are necessary for spindle assembly and chromosome alignment (EichenlaubRitter, 1998).…”
Section: Mitochondria and Meiosis In Oocytesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These abnormalities may affect the viability of postimplantation embryos or result in abnormal fetuses. Munne et al(1995) indicated that aged female has a much higher proportion of embryos with normal appearance but abnormal genes, especially chromosomal aneuploidies, compared with younger ones. As we know, motor proteins and protein kinases are necessary for spindle assembly and chromosome alignment (EichenlaubRitter, 1998).…”
Section: Mitochondria and Meiosis In Oocytesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other authors drill the zona and then aspirate the blastomere or exert pressure on the zona to push the blastomere out through the hole (10)(11)(12). Among these techniques of embryo biopsy, zona drilling and blastomere aspiration using different micropipettes are the most prevalent at centers of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (13,14). However, it is inconvenient and time-consuming to change the drilling micropipette for the biopsy micropipette.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also FISH is not a very efficient technique to use at the single cell level (Ruangvutilert et al, 2000). At this time, some groups decided that PGD technology using FISH to analyse as many chromosomes as possible might be useful as an embryo selection method for patients of advanced maternal age, repeated implantation failure or repeated miscarriage (when the chromosomes in the parents were normal) (Munné et al, 1995, Verlinsky et al 1995.…”
Section: The Current Status Of Pgd and Pgsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also FISH is not a very efficient technique to use at the single cell level (Ruangvutilert et al, 2000). At this time, some groups decided that PGD technology using FISH to analyse as many chromosomes as possible might be useful as an embryo selection method for patients of advanced maternal age, repeated implantation failure or repeated miscarriage (when the chromosomes in the parents were normal) (Munné et al, 1995, Verlinsky et al 1995.This technique is usually referred to as preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) and should be differentiated from PGD as it is for a different group of patients and for a different reason.Testing by PCR PGD for couples at risk of a single gene disorder is usually performed using PCR (Harper and SenGupta, 2011). This technique has become highly sophisticated over the years, with one of the most important developments being multiplex PCR which allows the analysis of the mutation and also a contamination check (Harton et al, 2011b The mutation site can be included for amplification in the multiplex reaction.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%