Abstract:Abstract. Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) of rat cerebral cortex were evaluated using a tissue segment radioligand binding assay. [3 H]-Quinuclidinyl benzilate (QNB, a hydrophobic ligand) specifically bound to mAChRs in the cortex segments. The total mAChRs level was approximately 2,000 fmol/mg protein, which was estimated after incubation for 120 min at 37°C or for 8 h at 4°C. These mAChRs were a mixture of high-and low-affinity sites for N-methylscopolamine (NMS) in a 70:30 ratio. In contrast, on… Show more
“…The main finding of this study was that, as in cerebral cortex and rabbit cornea cells (Lind and Cavanagh 1993;Lee et al 2010), the N1E-115 neuroblastoma cells constitutively possess both intracellular and plasma membrane-localized populations of M 1 -mAChRs. Furthermore, our data clearly indicate that the mAChRs at both sites are independently activated by carbachol or the endogenous ligand, acetylcholine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The main finding of this study was that, as in cerebral cortex and rabbit cornea cells (Lind and Cavanagh 1993; Lee et al. 2010), the N1E‐115 neuroblastoma cells constitutively possess both intracellular and plasma membrane‐localized populations of M 1 ‐mAChRs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Recently, we identified intracellular M 1 ‐mAChRs in rat cortex and hippocampus (Lee et al. 2010 and unpublished observations).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Apart from the multiple intracellular mechanisms whereby the M 1 -mAChR activates ERK1/2, it is uniformly presumed that the initial signal is generated by a cell surface receptor. In our recent work with rat cerebral tissue segments, as opposed to membrane receptor preparations, we have obtained evidence that there are two 'pools' of M 1 -mAChR in intact tissues, one localized on plasma membrane that can interact with the cell-impermeable 'hydrophilic' antagonist, N-methyl-scopolamine (NMS) and the other, intracellularly localized, that interacts with the cell-permeable 'hydrophobic' antagonist, qunuclidinyl benzilate (QNB) (Lee et al 2010). However, it was unclear whether the intracellular M 1 -mAChR is actually functional or non-functional as a backup for the plasma membrane localized receptors.…”
J. Neurochem. (2011) 118, 958–967.
Abstract
Signaling by muscarinic agonists is thought to result from the activation of cell surface acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) that transmit extracellular signals to intracellular systems. In N1E‐115 neuroblastoma cells, we detected both plasma membrane and intracellular M1‐mAChRs using both biochemical and pharmacological methods. In intact cells, both plasma membrane and intracellular M1‐mAChRs were detected by the hydrophobic ligand probe, 1‐quinuclidinyl‐[phenyl‐4‐3H]‐benzilate ([3H]‐QNB) whereas the hydrophilic probe, 1‐[N‐methyl‐3H] scopolamine ([3H]‐NMS), detected only cell surface receptors. These probes detected comparable numbers of receptors in isolated membrane preparations. Immunohistochemical studies with M1‐mAChR antibody also detected both cell‐surface and intracellular M1‐mAChRs. Carbachol‐stimulated phosphatidylinositol hydrolysis and Ca2+ mobilization were completely inhibited by a cell‐impermeable M1 antagonist, muscarinic toxin ‐7 and the Gq/11 inhibitor YM‐254890. However, carbachol‐stimulated extracellular‐regulated kinase 1/2 activation was unaffected by muscarinic toxin‐7, but was blocked by the cell‐permeable antagonist, pirenzepine. extracellular regulated kinase 1/2 phosphorylation was resistant to blockade of Gq/11 (YM‐254890) and protein kinase C (bisindolylmaleimide I). Our data suggest that the geographically distinct M1‐mAChRs (cell surface versus intracellular) can signal via unique signaling pathways that are differentially sensitive to cell‐impermeable versus cell‐permeable antagonists. Our data are of potential physiological relevance to signaling that affects both cognitive and neurodegenerative processes.
“…The main finding of this study was that, as in cerebral cortex and rabbit cornea cells (Lind and Cavanagh 1993;Lee et al 2010), the N1E-115 neuroblastoma cells constitutively possess both intracellular and plasma membrane-localized populations of M 1 -mAChRs. Furthermore, our data clearly indicate that the mAChRs at both sites are independently activated by carbachol or the endogenous ligand, acetylcholine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The main finding of this study was that, as in cerebral cortex and rabbit cornea cells (Lind and Cavanagh 1993; Lee et al. 2010), the N1E‐115 neuroblastoma cells constitutively possess both intracellular and plasma membrane‐localized populations of M 1 ‐mAChRs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Recently, we identified intracellular M 1 ‐mAChRs in rat cortex and hippocampus (Lee et al. 2010 and unpublished observations).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Apart from the multiple intracellular mechanisms whereby the M 1 -mAChR activates ERK1/2, it is uniformly presumed that the initial signal is generated by a cell surface receptor. In our recent work with rat cerebral tissue segments, as opposed to membrane receptor preparations, we have obtained evidence that there are two 'pools' of M 1 -mAChR in intact tissues, one localized on plasma membrane that can interact with the cell-impermeable 'hydrophilic' antagonist, N-methyl-scopolamine (NMS) and the other, intracellularly localized, that interacts with the cell-permeable 'hydrophobic' antagonist, qunuclidinyl benzilate (QNB) (Lee et al 2010). However, it was unclear whether the intracellular M 1 -mAChR is actually functional or non-functional as a backup for the plasma membrane localized receptors.…”
J. Neurochem. (2011) 118, 958–967.
Abstract
Signaling by muscarinic agonists is thought to result from the activation of cell surface acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) that transmit extracellular signals to intracellular systems. In N1E‐115 neuroblastoma cells, we detected both plasma membrane and intracellular M1‐mAChRs using both biochemical and pharmacological methods. In intact cells, both plasma membrane and intracellular M1‐mAChRs were detected by the hydrophobic ligand probe, 1‐quinuclidinyl‐[phenyl‐4‐3H]‐benzilate ([3H]‐QNB) whereas the hydrophilic probe, 1‐[N‐methyl‐3H] scopolamine ([3H]‐NMS), detected only cell surface receptors. These probes detected comparable numbers of receptors in isolated membrane preparations. Immunohistochemical studies with M1‐mAChR antibody also detected both cell‐surface and intracellular M1‐mAChRs. Carbachol‐stimulated phosphatidylinositol hydrolysis and Ca2+ mobilization were completely inhibited by a cell‐impermeable M1 antagonist, muscarinic toxin ‐7 and the Gq/11 inhibitor YM‐254890. However, carbachol‐stimulated extracellular‐regulated kinase 1/2 activation was unaffected by muscarinic toxin‐7, but was blocked by the cell‐permeable antagonist, pirenzepine. extracellular regulated kinase 1/2 phosphorylation was resistant to blockade of Gq/11 (YM‐254890) and protein kinase C (bisindolylmaleimide I). Our data suggest that the geographically distinct M1‐mAChRs (cell surface versus intracellular) can signal via unique signaling pathways that are differentially sensitive to cell‐impermeable versus cell‐permeable antagonists. Our data are of potential physiological relevance to signaling that affects both cognitive and neurodegenerative processes.
“…Nowadays, BZ is commonly used for identification of M receptors via several laboratory techniques, mainly radio-ligand binding assay [e.g. 2,3], and, due to its psychotomimetic properties, it has also been used to generate a cognitive deficit in animal models of neurodegenerative disorders, such as Alzheimer's disease [4][5][6].…”
The military incapacitating agent BZ (3-quinuclidinyl benzilate) is an anticholinergic compound that acts at both, the peripheral and central nervous system. Effects of the agent were discovered during the Cold War and BZ became one of the most potent anticholinergic psychomimetics, characterized by low effective doses causing long-term incapacitation. History, characteristics and potential use of BZ in behavioral research are discussed throughout this review.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.