Assessment of Marine Litter in the Barents Sea, a Part of the Joint Norwegian–Russian Ecosystem Survey

Abstract

This study presents a large-scale monitoring of marine litter performed in the joint Norwegian-Russian ecosystem monitoring surveys in the period from 2010 to 2016 and contribute to documentation of the extent of marine litter in the Barents Sea. The distribution and abundance of marine litter were calculated by recordings of bycatch from the pelagic trawling in upper 60 m, from bottom trawling close to the sea floor, and floating marine debris at surface by visual observations. The study is comprehensive regarding coverage and number with registrations from 2,265 pelagic trawls and 1,860 bottom trawls, in addition to surface registration between the stations. Marine litter has been recorded from 301 pelagic and 624 of the bottom trawl catches. In total, 784 visual observations of floating marine debris were recorded during the period. Marine litter has been categorized according to volume or weight of the material types plastic, wood, metal, rubber, glass, paper, and textile. Marine litter is observed in the entire Barents Sea and distribution vary with material densities, ocean currents and depth. Plastic dominated number of observations with marine litter, as 72% of surface observations, 94% of pelagic trawls, and 86% of bottom trawls contained plastic. Observations of wood constituted 19% of surface observations, 1% of pelagic trawls, and 17% of bottom trawls with marine litter. Materials from other categories such as metal, rubber, paper, textile, and glass were observed sporadically. Recordings of wood dominated surface observations (61.9 ± 21.6% by volume) and on seafloor (59.4 ± 35.0% by weight), while plastic dominated marine litter observations in upper 60 m depth (86.4 ± 16.5% by weight) over these 7 years. Based on recordings and volume or area covered, mean levels of plastic in the upper 60 m of the Barents Sea were found to 0.011 mg m −3 (pelagic) and 2.9 kg km −2 at sea floor over the study period. Average levels of marine litter (all material types) at the sea floor were found to be 26 kg km −2 .

Tidal inlets in the Anthropocene: Geomorphology and benthic habitats of the Chioggia inlet, Venice Lagoon (Italy)

“…The anthropogenic submerged litter and abandoned fishing gear are an emerging issue for the society and for marine sciences: however, most of the available researches are based on photograph/video surveys (e.g. Schlining et al ., ; Pham et al ., ) or on samples collected by seabed trawling (Kammann et al ., ; Grøsvik et al ., ; Maes et al ., ; Madricardo et al ., ) being mainly focused on plastic/glass rubbles. This study also confirms that MBES surveys can be a useful aid in mapping the density distribution of macro‐litter and wrecks in shallow coastal areas.…”

Concentration and Characteristic of Floating Plastic Debris in Jakarta Bay: a Preliminary Study

“…Since our method was relatively simple in comparison to the common at-sea survey, such as net-based survey using neuston net or pelagic trawl (Yamashita & Tanimura, 2007;Grøsvik et al, 2018) also a visual survey from the boat or aircraft (Hinojosa & Thiel, 2009;Suaria & Aliani, 2014), the litter density of Jakarta Bay from the present study might be underestimated. This is due to the sampling device limits to collect objects less than 40 cm.…”

Linking Ecology to Genetics to Better Understand Adaptation and Evolution: A Review in Marine Macrophytes

“…Choi (Wang et al, 2020), and the seagrass Z. marina (Olsen et al, 2016). This makes these species candidate models to link eco-physiology to genetics and beyond, for example, the identification of candidate male reproductive genes and mutant generation in E. siliculosus (Peters et al, 2008;Lipinska et al, 2015), the specific adaptive responses and mechanisms to environmental extremes in C. crispus and P. umbilicalis (Knoth and Wiencke, 1984;Collén et al, 2010), or the interactive genetic and environmental impact on thallus morphogenesis in U. mutabilis (Wichard et al, 2015). These genome resources can provide unprecedented opportunities to identify potential genes or genomic loci underpinning adaptive evolution and responses to environmental selection, using outlier analysis (e.g., genotype-environment association methods) (Forester et al, 2016).…”