Volume 5: Design, Analysis, Control and Diagnosis of Fluid Power Systems 2008
DOI: 10.1115/imece2008-69085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Loss Correlations for Performance Prediction of Low Reaction Gas Turbine Stages

Abstract: In spite of the remarkable advances in the field of the Computational Fluid Dynamics, algebraic models built upon empirical loss and deviation correlations are still one of the most reliable and effective tools to predict the performance of gas turbine stages with reasonable accuracy, especially when low-reaction, multi-stage architectures are considered. This paper deals with a comparison among some of the most popular loss correlations used by gas turbine manufacturers; such comparison is performed on a two-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Surprisingly, there are only few references that addresses this topic in details. Wei [33] and Benini et al [34] provided a comparison between the measured loss on a low aspect ratio two stages turbine rig and several loss model predictions. Among these, the KO model could overestimate up to 33% and 200% above the stator and rotor benchmark values respectively and it is inferred by loss breakdown that the secondary loss has the largest contribution at near design conditions.…”
Section: Its Profile Loss Is Defined Asmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surprisingly, there are only few references that addresses this topic in details. Wei [33] and Benini et al [34] provided a comparison between the measured loss on a low aspect ratio two stages turbine rig and several loss model predictions. Among these, the KO model could overestimate up to 33% and 200% above the stator and rotor benchmark values respectively and it is inferred by loss breakdown that the secondary loss has the largest contribution at near design conditions.…”
Section: Its Profile Loss Is Defined Asmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computational implementation for reference and proposed loss calculation methods were implemented by the author in Matlab 2011b. Traditional estimation models implementation were checked against published results [33,34]. proposed loss calculation methods were implemented by the author in Matlab 2011b.…”
Section: Comparison With Traditional Estimation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…proposed loss calculation methods were implemented by the author in Matlab 2011b. Traditional estimation models implementation were checked against published results [33,34].…”
Section: Comparison With Traditional Estimation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%