Assessment of Liver Fibrosis with Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Using Different b-values in Chronic Viral Hepatitis

Abstract

Objective: To examine the effectiveness of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values and to compare the reliability of different b-values in detecting and identifying significant liver fibrosis. Subjects and Methods: There were 44 patients with chronic viral hepatitis (CVH) in the study group and 30 healthy participants in the control group. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) was performed before the liver biopsy in patients with CVH. The values of ADC were measured with 3 different b-values (100, 600, 1,000 s/mm²). In addition, liver fibrosis was classified using the modified Ishak scoring system. Liver fibrosis stages and ADC values were compared using areas under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results: The study group's mean ADC value was not statistically significantly different from the control group's mean ADC value at b = 100 s/mm² (3.69 ± 0.5 × 10^-3 vs. 3.7 ± 0.3 × 10^-3 mm²/s) and b = 600 s/mm² (2.40 ± 0.3 × 10^-3 vs. 2.5 ± 0.5 × 10^-3 mm²/s). However, the study group's mean ADC value (0.99 ± 0.3 × 10^-3 mm²/s) was significantly lower than that of the control group (1.2 ± 0.1 × 10^-3 mm²/s) at b = 1,000 s/mm². With b = 1,000 s/mm² and the cutoff ADC value of 0.0011 mm²/s for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis, the mean area under the ROC curve was 0.702 ± 0.07 (p = 0.0015). For b = 1,000 s/mm² and the cutoff ADC value of 0.0011 mm²/s to diagnose significant liver fibrosis (Ishak score = 3), the mean area under the ROC curve was 0.759 ± 0.07 (p = 0.0001). Conclusion: Measurement of ADC values by DWI was effective in detecting liver fibrosis and accurately identifying significant liver fibrosis when a b-value of 1,000 s/mm² was used.

Diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging of liver: Principles, clinical applications and recent updates

“…A recent meta-analysis suggests that DWI and IVIM parameters can reliably stage hepatic fibrosis[ 65 , 66 ]. However, IVIM measurements and ADC values have been reported to be influenced by presence of fat or iron within the liver that can impact their accuracy for staging of fibrosis[ 67 - 69 ] and ascites[ 70 ]. Recent studies comparing MR elastography (MRE) and DWI in characterizing hepatic fibrosis demonstrate higher predictive ability of MRE in distinguishing stages of fibrosis compared to DWI[ 71 , 72 ].…”

The Role of Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 5 and Transforming Growth Factor-β₁ in Hepatic Fibrosis Induced by Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection in Egyptian Patients

“…Hepatic fibrosis develops primarily as a consequence of chronic viral hepatitis [2]. The mechanism of hepatic fibrosis is not fully understood.…”

Multiparametric MR mapping in clinical decision-making for diffuse liver disease

“…Whilst mainly applied clinically in focal lesion characterisation, recent developments have potential utility in viral hepatitis and staging fibrosis [105][106][107][108][109][110]. Limitations include lack of standardisation with inconsistencies reported for field strength [111] and B values [112,113]. Imaging homogeneity artefacts can be improved with simultaneous multi-slice respiratory-triggered acceleration (SMS-RT-DWI) [114].…”