2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00261-020-02684-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Multiparametric MR mapping in clinical decision-making for diffuse liver disease

Abstract: Accurate diagnosis, monitoring and treatment decisions in patients with chronic liver disease currently rely on biopsy as the diagnostic gold standard, and this has constrained early detection and management of diseases that are both varied and can be concurrent. Recent developments in multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) suggest real potential to bridge the diagnostic gap between non-specific blood-based biomarkers and invasive and variable histological diagnosis. This has implications for the c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 171 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Iron-corrected liver T 1 is a histologically validated imaging biomarker of hepatic fibro-inflammation, [19] which has subsequently been developed in Liver MultiScan where it is increasingly being used to monitor the response of hepatitis to novel therapies. [20] By contrast, no statistically significant differences were seen in liver fat ( p =0·18), iron ( p =0·60) and extracellular volume fraction (a marker of diffuse fibrosis, p =0·60) between both groups. Iron-corrected liver T 1 correlated moderately with systemic markers of inflammation (white cell count, neutrophil, monocyte count and CRP) in patients (appendix Table 4, p21), but also in controls.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Iron-corrected liver T 1 is a histologically validated imaging biomarker of hepatic fibro-inflammation, [19] which has subsequently been developed in Liver MultiScan where it is increasingly being used to monitor the response of hepatitis to novel therapies. [20] By contrast, no statistically significant differences were seen in liver fat ( p =0·18), iron ( p =0·60) and extracellular volume fraction (a marker of diffuse fibrosis, p =0·60) between both groups. Iron-corrected liver T 1 correlated moderately with systemic markers of inflammation (white cell count, neutrophil, monocyte count and CRP) in patients (appendix Table 4, p21), but also in controls.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Iron-corrected liver T 1 is a histologically validated imaging biomarker of hepatic fibro-inflammation, 15 which has subsequently been developed in Liver MultiScan where it is increasingly being used to monitor the response of hepatitis to novel therapies. 16 By contrast, liver fat, iron and extracellular volume fraction (a marker of diffuse fibrosis) did not differ between groups. Iron-corrected liver T 1 correlated moderately with systemic markers of inflammation (white cell count, neutrophil, monocyte count and CRP) in patients ( appendix Table 4, p21 ), but also in controls.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…This could then impact decisions for their own health regarding suitability for other clinical interventions or their suitability as a liver donor. MRI has been shown to provide a more accurate and comprehensive measure of liver health with techniques such as Liver MultiScan, which provide measures of liver iron, fibro-inflammation and liver fat [24,25,46]. Importantly, these measures are standardised across different MRI scanners and field strengths and have a very high technical success rate [47].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%