2014 IEEE International Conference on Control System, Computing and Engineering (ICCSCE 2014) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/iccsce.2014.7072748
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of knee joint abnormality using Acoustic Emission sensors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results obtained from statistical parameters comprising of AE events, peak magnitude and average signal level showed that OA knees produced consistently and significantly more AE events with higher peak magnitude and average signal level values than healthy knees. In Sarillee and co‐worker's study , discrimination was done using wavelet packet transform. They obtained an accuracy of more than 80% after principal component analysis using a feed forward neural network and support vector machine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results obtained from statistical parameters comprising of AE events, peak magnitude and average signal level showed that OA knees produced consistently and significantly more AE events with higher peak magnitude and average signal level values than healthy knees. In Sarillee and co‐worker's study , discrimination was done using wavelet packet transform. They obtained an accuracy of more than 80% after principal component analysis using a feed forward neural network and support vector machine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since no studies have yet been conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of this technique in controlled environment to diagnose OA, the aim of the current study was to provide a novel alternative method to detect OA, even at a mild stage of the condition. The AE technique has previously been reported for detecting OA in human knees , and OA knees produced consistently and significantly more AE events with higher amplitudes and longer duration than healthy knees . In Shark and co‐worker's study , the discrimination was done using the four‐phase model of sit‐stand‐sit movement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several groups of researchers achieved over 90 percent accuracy in the detection of osteoarthritic changes in knee joints with the use of acoustic signal analysis [ 31 ]. In recent decades, numerous research groups have developed this method of evaluating articular cartilage on the basis of both acoustic [ 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 ] and vibrational signals [ 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 ]. Despite the long history of the use of vibroacoustic assessment, no clear criteria have emerged for the use of this method in widespread clinical practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such sensing modalities include the measurement of joint acoustics, edema, and activity via miniature microphones, electrical bioimpedance (EBI) circuitry, and inertial measurement units (IMUs), respectively. For example, joint acoustical emissions ("joint sounds") have been used to discriminate healthy subjects and those with osteoarthritis [1], [2], classify varying conditions of the patellofemoral joint [3], monitor improvements in kids with juvenile idiopathic arthritis after receiving effective medication [4], track rehabilitation improvements in athletes following an acute injury [5], and show changes in loading stresses on the joint [6]. Similarly, EBI has been used to detect swelling (edema) of the joint [7], and studies have demonstrated its efficacy for detecting changes in edema during injury recovery [8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%