No abstract

The paper presents the results from FEM (Finite Element Method) analysis of the process of pulling out of the undercut anchor. Anchors of this type are generally used to fasten steel structural elements in concrete buildings. However, the presented issue concerns a new area of application of these fasteners, i.e. in the aspect of the potential mining of rock in atypical situations, such as in mining rescue operations. Generally, in such situations there is no possibility of mechanical mining of rock with the use of mining machines and the use of explosives is even prohibited. There are only manual loosening methods whose effectiveness is unknown. Currently, the basic issue is to gain insight into the mechanism of loosening, the mechanics of the process in terms of the extent of loosening and shaping the force of pulling out anchors in a given rock. An effective tool in this type of analysis is FEM analysis, the results of which are presented in the paper.

An objective of this study was to investigate the group effect in rock cone failure occurring in pull-out with the use of 3D finite element analysis. At present, undercut anchors are typically applied as structural fasteners of steel elements in concrete buildings; however, new areas for their use are being explored. The reported study set out to evaluate the use of undercut anchors in special-purpose rock mining, e.g., in mining rescue operations. In such emergencies, mechanical mining may prove impossible, whereas the use of explosives is even prohibited. Although manual methods could be considered, their effectiveness is hard to assess. Prior to considering the use of undercut anchors in mining, several aspects must essentially be determined: The mechanics of cone failure, including the extent of surface failure and the values of the pull-out force of the anchor for a given rock mass relative to the anchor system, the embedment depth, or the rock strength parameters. These factors may be investigated successfully using finite element analysis, the results of which are presented in the study.

Purpose: This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of physical examination and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in knee injuries. Methods: Ninety-six patients at a regional hospital were included in the study. Each participant underwent a physical examination in which menisci and ACL were evaluated. Knee joint MRI was collected from each patient. Physical examination and MRI scans were then compared with knee arthroscopy findings as a golden standard for meniscal and ligamentous lesions. The data were analyzed and specificity and sensitivity were calculated and correlated on receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves. Results: Knee arthroscopy diagnosed 32 total ACL ruptures, 45 medial meniscus and 17 lateral meniscus lesions. Three patients were diagnosed with bilateral meniscal lesions. The highest sensitivities were the McMurray test (87.5%) for medial meniscus (MM) and the Thessaly test (70%) for lateral meniscus (LM). The most sensitive ACL test was Lachman (84.5%), whereas, the pivot shift and Lelli tests were the most specific (98.5%). MRI was highly sensitive for MM (96%) with specificity of 52%. MRI showed lower sensitivity (70%) and higher specificity (85.5%) for LM. The specificity of MRI for ACL rupture was 92%, with sensitivity only 75%. Conclusion: McMurray and Apley tests for meniscal lesions seem the most appropriate in daily practice. A combination of lever signs, pivot shifts (PSs) and Lachman tests showed the best sensitivity and specificity in detecting ACL deficiency, and was superior to MRI.

This paper presents the results of a numerical FEM (Finite Element Method) simulation of the formation of a rock failure zone in its initial stage of development. The influence of rock parameters, such as the Young’s modulus, Poisson’s ratio and friction factor of the rock in the contact zone with the working surface of the undercut anchor head, were taken into account. The obtained results of FEM simulations were compared with the results of field tests conducted in Polish mining plants extracting rock raw materials.

This study employs the numerical analysis and experimental testing to analyze the fracturing mechanics and the size of rock cones formed in the pull-out of a system of three undercut anchors. The research sets out to broaden the knowledge regarding: (a) the potential of the undercut anchor pull-out process in mining of the rock mass, and (b) estimating the load-carrying capacity of anchors embedded in the rock mass (which is distinctly different from the anchorage to concrete). Undercut anchors are most commonly applied as fasteners of steel components in concrete structures. The new application for undercut anchors postulated in this paper is their use in rock mining in exceptional conditions, such as during mining rescue operations, which for safety considerations may exclude mechanical mining techniques, mining machines, or explosives. The remaining solution is manual rock fracture, whose effectiveness is hard to assess. The key issue in the analyzed aspect is the rock fracture mechanics, which requires in-depth consideration that could provide the assistance in predicting the breakout prism dimensions and the load-displacement behavior of specific anchorage systems, embedment depth, and rock strength parameters. The volume of rock breakout prisms is an interesting factor to study as it is critical to energy consumption and, ultimately, the efficiency of the process. Our investigations are supported by the FEM (Finite Element Method) analysis, and the developed models have been validated by the results from experimental testing performed in a sandstone mine. The findings presented here illuminate the discrepancies between the current technology, test results, and standards that favor anchorage to concrete, particularly in the light of a distinct lack of scientific and industry documentation describing the anchorage systems’ interaction with rock materials, which exhibit high heterogeneity of the internal structure or bedding. The Concrete Capacity Design (CCD) method approximates that the maximum projected radius of the breakout cone on the free surface of concrete corresponds to the length of at the most three embedment depths (hef). In rock, the dimensions of the breakout prism are found to exceed the CCD recommendations by 20–33%. The numerical computations have demonstrated that, for the nominal breakout prism angle of approx. 35% (CCD), the critical spacing for which the anchor group effect occurs is ~4.5 (a cross-section through two anchor axes). On average, the observed spacing values were in the range of 3.6–4.0.

No abstract

AbstractThe method of unconventional solid rock loosening with undercutting anchors and the literature analysis of the problem are presented. The tests and test results of the rocks loosening process with a fixed undercutting anchor are described. The tests were carried out within the RODEST project, OPUS 10 competition No. 2015/19/B/ST10/02817, financed by the National Science Centre. Numerical modeling process as well as a series of laboratory and in situ tests were carried out. The test stand equipment and methodology for the in situ tests are presented. The tests were conducted in four mines, which allowed to obtain and determine the following characteristics: loosening force as a function of anchoring depth (for a given type of rock),the range of rock loosening in a function of anchoring depth (for a given type of rock), andloosened rock volume as a function of anchoring depth (for a given type of rock).The in situ test results are compared with the concrete capacity design (CCD) model used for the calculation of anchor load capacity in concrete.