Assessment of inferior alveolar and lingual nerve disturbances after dentoalveolar surgery, and of recovery of sensitivity

Schultze-Mosgau, S.; Reich, Rudolf H.

doi:10.1016/s0901-5027(05)80638-1

Cited by 113 publications

(53 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…6,23 The presence of altered sensation negatively correlated with subjective function at four, 12 and 24 weeks, possibly highlighting the increased rate of troublesome altered sensation in those with persistent injuries. Altered sensation provided no outcome predictive value, in agreement with a previous report.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…1,5,6 As a consequence there is limited information on how and when these injuries resolve and very few reports attempt to identify the predictive value of various tests for lingual nerve injury resolution. 6 Mason 1 stated that the most important information that the patient wishes to know is will the neuropathy recover, and if so, when? Currently, reassurance is based on the probability of recovery, as most cases do recover spontaneously.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Only two studies report detailed longitudinal assessment of the outcome of lingual nerve injuries. 1,6 Most of the studies evaluating conventional mechanical tests have been performed on patients with inferior alveolar nerve injuries subsequent to orthognathic surgery. A recent study reports that brush stroke direction, warm/cold and sharp blunt tests are unreliable in evaluating inferior alveolar nerve injury.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Simplifying the assessment of the recovery from surgical injury to the lingual nerve

Renton¹,

Thexton

Crean³

et al. 2006

Br Dent J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Simplifying the assessment of the recovery from surgical injury to the lingual nerve

Renton¹,

Thexton

Crean³

et al. 2006

Br Dent J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Chez 1 patient sur 100, on note une paresthésie ou une dysesthésie permanente de la lèvre infé-rieure, des joues et de la langue [50] et 5 à 15 % des patients souffrent des mêmes symptômes au niveau des deux tiers antérieurs de la langue et de la lèvre. Schutz-Mosgau et Reich indiquent que 1 à 8 patients sur 100 peuvent avoir une « sensation de fourmillement ou d'engourdissement » de la lèvre inférieure, des joues et de la langue [51] . Queral-Godoy et coll.…”

Section: Risques Liés à L'avulsion Des Dents De Sagesse Mandibulairesunclassified

Indications d'avulsion des dents de sagesse mandibulaires dans le cadre militaire

Gunepin¹,

Derache

Bedrune

et al. 2008

Med Buccale Chir Buccale

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

RÉSUMÉLa décision d'extraire ou non des dents de sagesse mandibulaires, notamment asymptomatiques, est souvent mal comprise par les personnels militaires. Cet acte chirurgical est perçu comme systématique et allant à l'encontre des recommandations des praticiens civils. L'objectif de ce travail est de mettre en exergue le fait que les décisions des praticiens militaires se prennent conformément aux recommandations de bonnes pratiques civiles avec une évaluation du rapport béné-fices/risques de l'intervention pour les patients. Cependant, les services de santé des armées, français et étran-gers, doivent impérativement prendre en considération certains paramètres inhérents aux conditions de vie des militaires, notamment au cours des opérations extérieures, afin d'orienter les choix thérapeutiques dans le but de maintenir la capacité opérationnelle des Forces. SUMMARY The removal of mandibular third molars is frequent in French and foreign armies. This doesn't mean that theses extractions are systematic for all soldiers. The military practitioners follow the same recommendations than their civilian colleagues by establishing a ratio benefits/risks for their patients. In the civilian area, the consequences of the surgical approach (extractions of third molars) are well known, but the benefits of the conservative approach are not well documented (few number of studies, biais in the constitution of groups of patients… ). This is why the indications for the removal of mandibular third molars are not always easy to take by civilian practitioners. In the army, other parameters are taken into account. The military conditions of life, especially during operations, enforce a particular ratio benefits/risks for soldiers. In fact, military dentists take operations particularities into consideration: tiredness, stress, boredom sometimes lead to decrease the oral/food/personal hygiene of soldiers. All conditions are gathered to increase mandibular third molars problems (pericoronatis for example). These pathologies are a great handicap for soldiers but also for all Units. A medical evacuation on a battle field generates a lack of operational capabilities (medical team, escort, vehicles, helicopter…) and a real risk for soldiers (improvised explosive device, road accident…). All these military particularities and their dental consequences are published through international medical journals and impact directly the indications for the removal of mandibular third molars

show abstract

“…Inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) injury is one of the most serious complications of mandibular molar surgery, which may affect the quality of the patient's life and may cause the litigation for mal-practice 4 . Permanent injury to the IAN is estimated between 0.4-23% 1,5,6 .…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Tooth multi-sectioning with the use of magnification, for extraction of a deeply impacted lower second molar with entrapment of the inferior alveolar nerve: Report of a case

Tilaveridis¹,

Dalambiras²,

Λαζαρίδου³

et al. 2016

Balkan J Dent Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SUMMARY Inferior alveolar nerve injury is one of the most serious complications of mandibular molar surgery and may lead to litigation for mal-practice. Entrapment of the inferior alveolar nerve to roots of an impacted mandibular molars is extremely rare. The aim of this case report is to stress the importance of tooth multi-sectioning with the use of magnification for the safe removal of a deeply impacted second molar with entrapment of the inferior alveolar nerve in its proximal root.

show abstract

Assessment of inferior alveolar and lingual nerve disturbances after dentoalveolar surgery, and of recovery of sensitivity

Cited by 113 publications

References 8 publications

Simplifying the assessment of the recovery from surgical injury to the lingual nerve

Simplifying the assessment of the recovery from surgical injury to the lingual nerve

Indications d'avulsion des dents de sagesse mandibulaires dans le cadre militaire

Tooth multi-sectioning with the use of magnification, for extraction of a deeply impacted lower second molar with entrapment of the inferior alveolar nerve: Report of a case

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About