2017
DOI: 10.1002/prot.25423
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of hard target modeling in CASP12 reveals an emerging role of alignment‐based contact prediction methods

Abstract: We present our assessment of CASP12 modeling efforts for targets with no obvious templates of high sequence/structure similarity in the PDB, that is for evaluation units of the free modeling (FM) and free modeling/template‐based modeling (FM/TBM) categories. Models were clustered and ranked using the Global Distance Test‐Total Score and 5 additional metrics developed in previous CASP rounds, producing short lists of models that were subject to visual inspection in comparison to the target structures. The whole… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
101
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

6
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
3
101
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to check whether the results of the methods were significantly different, we calculated a P value for each feature by using a pairwise Student's t test on the results of the 2 methods. Results on the independent test sets CASP12, TS115, and CB513 are presented in Table , and in an extended version in Supporting Information Table S1. They match to a very high degree with the results obtained by using a 4‐fold cross validation on the training set (Supporting Information Table S2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to check whether the results of the methods were significantly different, we calculated a P value for each feature by using a pairwise Student's t test on the results of the 2 methods. Results on the independent test sets CASP12, TS115, and CB513 are presented in Table , and in an extended version in Supporting Information Table S1. They match to a very high degree with the results obtained by using a 4‐fold cross validation on the training set (Supporting Information Table S2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Performance vs CASP round was plotted from the CASP12 plot and CASP13 data. All the data presented in the web app, HHpred (computed as HHblits score × coverage) and LGA score presented here, Neff, Grishin plots, were provided by the Prediction Center.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By comparing residue-residue coevolution strengths computed from an alignment of Cyc2-like proteins with the Gremlin server, 7,8 it appears that the predicted contacts match best with the contacts present in model #3 (Fig. 2B and different cutoffs of the coevolution data in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%