2017
DOI: 10.20546/ijcmas.2017.605.111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of GCV, PCV, Heritability and Genetic Advance for Yield and its Components in Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
16
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
6
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This suggesting that mostly these traits were under the control of additive gene action and selection will be more useful for yield improvement. Similar results were observed by Kant and Srivastava (2011) and Singh et al (2014) for plant height, branches per plant and seed yield in blackgram and Meena et al (2017) for biological yield and seed yield in chickpea. High heritability with moderate genetic advance was observed for pods per plant, pod length and seeds per pod, indicating that these traits were less influenced by environment but governed by both additive and non-additive gene action.…”
Section: Parameters Of Variabilitysupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This suggesting that mostly these traits were under the control of additive gene action and selection will be more useful for yield improvement. Similar results were observed by Kant and Srivastava (2011) and Singh et al (2014) for plant height, branches per plant and seed yield in blackgram and Meena et al (2017) for biological yield and seed yield in chickpea. High heritability with moderate genetic advance was observed for pods per plant, pod length and seeds per pod, indicating that these traits were less influenced by environment but governed by both additive and non-additive gene action.…”
Section: Parameters Of Variabilitysupporting
confidence: 89%
“…High heritability was recorded for the characters viz., number of seeds per plant (99.90%), seed yield per plant (99.90%), number of effective nodes per plant (99.70%), pod bearing length (99.70%), number of effective pods per plant (99.60%), 100 seed weight (99.50%), number of secondary branching per plant (99.30%), number of pod per plant (99.20%), biological yield per plant (99.20%). These findings are in general agreement with the findings of workers Katiyar et al (2014) [12] , Georgieva et al (2016) [6] and Meena et al (2017) [13] who also reported high heritability for these yield attributing trait The genetic advance as percentage of mean were highest for number of pods per plant (99.50%) followed by number of effective nodes per plant (99.35%), number of seeds per plant (87.31%), number of effective pods per plant (85.72%), number of nodes per plant (82.20%), seed yield per plant (80.14%). This result corroborated with the findings of Sharma et al (2007), Ahmad et al (2014) [1] , and Katiyar et al (2014) [12] .…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Genetic advance (GA) was estimated as per formula given by Allard (1960) and cited by Meena et al (2015). GA = k × Where: δ 2 p : Phenotypic variation δ 2 g : Genotypic variation k : The standard selection differential at 5% selection intensity (k = 2.063)…”
Section: Estimation Of Variance Componentsmentioning
confidence: 99%