“…21,[29][30][31][32][33] The results often carry large uncertainties, and the agreement between different measurements, if they exist, is poor, e.g., ∆ f H 298K °(g, 1,2,4-C 6 H 3 Cl 3 ) from two groups differ by as much as 13 kJ/mol. 25,27 Alternately, predictions of the enthalpies of formation of these compounds have used the group additivity method, [34][35][36][37] semiempirical PM3 11,38 and MNDO, 39,40 density functional theory (DFT) methods, 12,[41][42][43][44][45][46][47] and recently G3X calculations on ClBzs 44,48 and G3MP2 on several phenols and phenoxy radicals. 49 DFT and ab initio predictions are often coupled with isodesmic reactions to gain better reliability, and close agreement with the experimental and compiled values has been obtained for Di-ClBzs 12,41,44 and Di-ClPhs.…”