2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105707
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of fragility models based on the Sept 19th, 2017 earthquake observed damage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar closure patterns were observed in several other roads. A relationship between the damage states considered in some fragility curves and the structural damage observed in buildings for the earthquake in Mexico City in 2017 was identified by [65]. Considering those relations and the observed closure pattern, a new criterion for road closure was adopted for this research, which can be replicated in densely populated urban areas, where safety policies following major earthquakes are applied.…”
Section: Segments Closure Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar closure patterns were observed in several other roads. A relationship between the damage states considered in some fragility curves and the structural damage observed in buildings for the earthquake in Mexico City in 2017 was identified by [65]. Considering those relations and the observed closure pattern, a new criterion for road closure was adopted for this research, which can be replicated in densely populated urban areas, where safety policies following major earthquakes are applied.…”
Section: Segments Closure Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The analytical fragility curves, presented in Table 8, were selected to determine the probability of damage to structures in the study area. The damage prediction capabilities of these functions were assessed after the 2017 Mexico City earthquake [65]. However, the authors recognize there is still a degree of uncertainty related to the site-particular assumptions inherent in the fragility functions selected for the analyses.…”
Section: Fragility Curvesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, four key types of techniques can be found for seismic fragility analysis of structures, i.e. the empirical, hybrid, experimental, and analytical methods [34][35][36][37]. However, in these studies, all structure parameters are assumed to be deterministic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%