2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.05.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of finite element models for prediction of osteoporotic fracture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This major issue should warn clinicians of their will to use recently developed materials reporting FEA, as results from non-validated simulations can be associated with inaccuracy and overinterpretation [ 13 , 15 , 38 ]. Furthermore, it is of note that in 24/189 articles, the authors stated that the model was validated, but this did not correspond to the definition used in aircraft certification [ 39 , 40 ] and in biomedical FEA [ 8 ], which is based on a quantified assessment between FE models and experiments. However, the results of this work should not be overinterpreted, because one team contributed to almost half of the included studies with the chosen inclusion criteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This major issue should warn clinicians of their will to use recently developed materials reporting FEA, as results from non-validated simulations can be associated with inaccuracy and overinterpretation [ 13 , 15 , 38 ]. Furthermore, it is of note that in 24/189 articles, the authors stated that the model was validated, but this did not correspond to the definition used in aircraft certification [ 39 , 40 ] and in biomedical FEA [ 8 ], which is based on a quantified assessment between FE models and experiments. However, the results of this work should not be overinterpreted, because one team contributed to almost half of the included studies with the chosen inclusion criteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finite element analysis (FEA), a computer-based method to solve engineering problems, has been commonly used to investigate mechanical performance in aeronautical and automotive fields, but also to evaluate biomechanical behavior in the medical domain, whether for prediction of osteoporotic fracture, temporomandibular replacement, or tooth reconstruction [ 8 , 9 , 10 ]. This numerical technique allows the development of patient-specific FEA, the measure of the impact of mechanical stress following force application, and the selection of the biomaterial most appropriate for a personalized clinical application [ 11 , 12 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A brief paragraph, or even better a table, addressing all information for continuum modelling shown in Table 2 should be present. In addiction, further information on used mechanical properties and numerical techniques, as shown in Table 2 of [148], would facilitate the understanding and reproducibility of the simulations.…”
Section: Remark 7 (Unifying Framework For Bone Continuum Modeling)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Finite Element Method (FEM) subdivides the spatial domain into subdomains (or elements) and approximates the governing equations by traditional variational methods over each subdomain [303]. The FEM is by far the most used numerical method in the bone fracture literature [148,160,304]. Most probably because there are many commercial software with friendly user interfaces that facilitate its operation, and because the FEM is a mature field of research which has been optimized for several applications.…”
Section: Remark 25 (Misleading Term-nonlinear Analysis)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation