2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.cellbi.2008.07.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of fibroblast cells submitted to ultrasonic irradiation

Abstract: Physiotherapists consider ultrasound an indispensable tool, which is commonly employed in clinical practice as a treatment aid for musculoskeletal dysfunctions. The aim of our study has been to analyze fibroblast cell structures following low-intensity pulsed ultrasonic irradiation. Fibroblast cell cultures irradiated with ultrasound were analyzed through electron microscopy to determine an ideal irradiation beam that preserved cell morphology and integrity. Analysis by fluorescence microscopy and transmission… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(23 reference statements)
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 considered this increase in cell number to be a deleterious effect because the cells are involved in cellular division instead of collagen production. Their belief is supported by a previous study showing that fibroblasts submitted to PLIUS (intensity = 0.2–0.6 W/cm 2 ) at a 10% and 20% duty cycle can maintain their shape and integrity and also increase in number 34 ; the intensity and duty cycle for PLIUS used in the present study are within this range. However, it is not clear why the cell number increased after 10 days of PLIUS treatment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…6 considered this increase in cell number to be a deleterious effect because the cells are involved in cellular division instead of collagen production. Their belief is supported by a previous study showing that fibroblasts submitted to PLIUS (intensity = 0.2–0.6 W/cm 2 ) at a 10% and 20% duty cycle can maintain their shape and integrity and also increase in number 34 ; the intensity and duty cycle for PLIUS used in the present study are within this range. However, it is not clear why the cell number increased after 10 days of PLIUS treatment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Secondly, the characteristics and technique of ultrasound application are different. Furthermore, studies that documented adverse effects histologically used higher intensities (0.2-1 W/cm 2 ), but in our study, the LIPUS power emitted from the transducer did not exceed 33 mW/cm 2 (de Oliveira et al 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Likewise, according to Oliveira et al, (9) irradiation at doses of 0,2 and 0,6 W/cm 2 in both the 10% and 20% pulse rates over the 72 hour period increased the viability of L929 fibroblast cells, being significantly higher than in the non-irradiated group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…(4,5) On the other hand, the second, athermic, obtained in the output with pulses, is usually directed to the treatment of more severe or acute injuries, to improve the quality and speed of the recovery without increasing the local temperature. (6) In this sense, several authors report the efficiency of low intensity ultrasound in the percentage increase of viable cells cultured in vitro, with acceleration of proliferation and, (7)(8)(9) with the continuous, relevant therapeutic effects both in vivo and in vitro. (1,10) Furthermore, in the continuous mode, effects on the expression of cartilage specific mRNA in chondrocyte culture, (11) hypertrophy of muscle fibers, (1) or with pulsed modulation in biosynthetic activity and expression of integrins (12) and stimulation of anti-inflammatory systems in synovial membrane cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation