2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00056-016-0055-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of facial soft-tissue profiles based on lateral photographs versus three-dimensional face scans

Abstract: Given our findings of acceptable agreement between 3D scanning and 2D lateral photography, in combination with almost perfect internal agreement between different 3D view modes, it appears useful to adapt Schwarz's method of facial profile assessment for clinical use in 3D virtual environments.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All data regarding study groups were blinded prior to measurements and statistical evaluation. Since children with FAS show a delayed developmental trajectory, we chose to include slightly (but not statistically significant) younger children as controls in order to optimize comparability (8,38,39). Thus, the included children were similar in terms of parameters such as body length or weight.…”
Section: Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All data regarding study groups were blinded prior to measurements and statistical evaluation. Since children with FAS show a delayed developmental trajectory, we chose to include slightly (but not statistically significant) younger children as controls in order to optimize comparability (8,38,39). Thus, the included children were similar in terms of parameters such as body length or weight.…”
Section: Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two-dimensional (2D) facial measurement strategies have been developed based on 2D facial records, which can aid in the diagnosis of soft tissue aesthetic problems to some extent. However, due to the restriction of the dimension of the 2D measurement, drawbacks such as inaccuracy, the inaccessibility of three-dimensional (3D) facial morphology, and problematic superimposition of the anatomical structures have been identified in a few studies [ 2 , 3 ]. These major drawbacks limit the development of 2D measurements in the field of orthodontics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%