2007
DOI: 10.1002/chp.92
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of english-language proficiency for general practitioner registrars

Abstract: Language skills can be usefully assessed within a more comprehensive learning-needs analysis. In combination with this assessment, the provision of specific feedback and recommendations for appropriate language-learning opportunities is essential.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 9 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Over the past 30 years, the use of English for medical purposes has been analyzed in the different contexts. Research on evaluation of needs for specialized English learners has ranged from variety of studies including overcoming language barriers with foreign-language speaking patients (11), the role of computers in supporting access to the curriculum (12,13), the perception of English needs among medical college students (14,15), the assessment of English proficiency and success in medical staff (16,17). Some studies have focused their scope on the recommendations for development of the language courses and on identification of the teaching area gaps (18,19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the past 30 years, the use of English for medical purposes has been analyzed in the different contexts. Research on evaluation of needs for specialized English learners has ranged from variety of studies including overcoming language barriers with foreign-language speaking patients (11), the role of computers in supporting access to the curriculum (12,13), the perception of English needs among medical college students (14,15), the assessment of English proficiency and success in medical staff (16,17). Some studies have focused their scope on the recommendations for development of the language courses and on identification of the teaching area gaps (18,19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%