2019
DOI: 10.1142/s021951941940061x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Effective Blood Concentration Readings From Clinical Data on Patients With Heart Failure Diseases After Digoxin Intake: A Projection Based on the Inverse Problem Algorithm

Abstract: In this study, a projection of effective blood concentration (EBC) readings of digoxin is made using the inverse problem algorithm based on clinical data for patients with heart failure diseases. Seven factors, including body surface area (BSA), blood urine nitrogen (BUN), creatinine, sodium (Na), potassium (K), magnesium (Mg) ion readings, and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were compiled with nonlinear regression fit to develop a projection function having 29 terms obtained from an inverse problem algorithm via… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Noteworthy is that only in the study of Pan et al [1], the rank of constant (rank 14/16) was less than any others, namely, ranks 6/16, 7/29, 5/16, 5/22, and 6/22, respectively in the studies [2][3][4][5][6]. Thus, the optimized loss function, Φ (cf.…”
Section: Cross-interactions Among Factorsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Noteworthy is that only in the study of Pan et al [1], the rank of constant (rank 14/16) was less than any others, namely, ranks 6/16, 7/29, 5/16, 5/22, and 6/22, respectively in the studies [2][3][4][5][6]. Thus, the optimized loss function, Φ (cf.…”
Section: Cross-interactions Among Factorsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, a large constant also indicates a minor alignment that can be achieved in optimizing the solution. Noteworthy is that only in the study of Pan et al [ 1 ], the rank of constant (rank 14/16) was less than any others, namely, ranks 6/16, 7/29, 5/16, 5/22, and 6/22, respectively in the studies [ 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 ]. Thus, the optimized loss function, (cf.…”
Section: Integrated Review Of the Ipa Techniquementioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations