2002
DOI: 10.1007/s00204-002-0355-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of DNA damage in workers occupationally exposed to pesticide mixtures by the alkaline comet assay

Abstract: The potential genetic hazard of pesticides to human beings is of great concern in occupational and environmental settings because of the widespread use of these chemicals for domestic and industrial applications. Various studies have revealed a significantly elevated risk for particular tumours in humans exposed to some pesticides. Results from the biological monitoring or cytogenetic methods for the detection of health risks to pesticides have given both positive and negative results of mutagenicity. In this … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
14
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Exposed workers presented significantly longer comet tail lengths in exfoliated buccal cells than the non-exposed individuals. Our results agree with those of other authors who have used the comet assay in human lymphocytes to evaluate DNA damage in the biomonitoring of populations occupationally exposed to pesticides and it has demonstrated positive results (Garaj-Vrhovac and Zeljezic 2000Zeljezic and Garaj-Vrhovac 2001;Ünderğer and Başaran 2002;Grover et al 2003;Ascarrunz et al 2006;Castillo-Cadena et al 2006;Remor et al 2009;Paiva et al 2011;Wilhelm et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 95%
“…Exposed workers presented significantly longer comet tail lengths in exfoliated buccal cells than the non-exposed individuals. Our results agree with those of other authors who have used the comet assay in human lymphocytes to evaluate DNA damage in the biomonitoring of populations occupationally exposed to pesticides and it has demonstrated positive results (Garaj-Vrhovac and Zeljezic 2000Zeljezic and Garaj-Vrhovac 2001;Ünderğer and Başaran 2002;Grover et al 2003;Ascarrunz et al 2006;Castillo-Cadena et al 2006;Remor et al 2009;Paiva et al 2011;Wilhelm et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 95%
“…These findings are in accordance with the findings of the other workers. [284852] The damage was rather slightly higher (non-significant) in the non-smokers than smokers. Similar findings have been reported by some other authors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Several studies have reported less DNA damage in workers who used some kind of protective measures. [4052]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…neuroblastoma), soft tissue sarcomas (i.e. Ewig's sarcoma), and colorectal and testes carcinomas (Xavier et al, 2004); -Genotoxicity, including DNA damage in peripheral lymphocytes (Undeger & Basaran, 2002); -Blood disorders, including leukaemia and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (Zahm & Ward, 1998;Zahm et al, 1997); -and abnormalities in liver and kidneys, ... Between specific age ranges, infants and children are at great risk from the effects of pesticides.…”
Section: Disadvantages Of Using Pesticidesmentioning
confidence: 99%