Assessment of dental implant osseointegration from nonlinear dynamic response

Ramp, Lance C.; Jeffcoat, Robert L.

doi:10.1109/iembs.1999.803921

Cited by 1 publication

(2 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Binon30 investigated the effect of eliminating implant/abutment rotational misfit on screw joint stability, and reported that screw joints can be made more resistant to screw loosening by eliminating rotational misfit. Furthermore, there are reports evaluating dental implant stability and osseointegration with a dynamic response technique 31–34. Huang et al35 assessed the stability of dental implants by using natural frequency analysis, and observed linear relationships between response frequencies and the degree of implant stability.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Furthermore, there are reports evaluating dental implant stability and osseointegration with a dynamic response technique. [31][32][33][34] Huang et al 35 assessed the stability of dental implants by using natural frequency analysis, and observed linear relationships between response frequencies and the degree of implant stability. However, experimental research in this field seems laborious, tedious, expensive, and probably inefficient.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Influence of implant/abutment joint designs on abutment screw loosening in a dental implant system

et al. 2005

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objective of this study was to investigate the influence of implant/abutment joint designs on abutment screw loosening in a dental implant system, using nonlinear dynamic analysis of the finite element method (FEM). This finite element simulation study used two dental implant systems: the Ankylos implant system (Degusa Dental, Hanau, German) with a taper joint (taper joint-type model), and the Bränemark implant system (Nobel Biocare, Gothenburg, Sweden) with an external hex joint (external hex joint-type model). The nonlinear dynamic analysis was performed using three-dimensional finite element analysis. In comparing the movement of the taper type-joint model and external hex type-joint model, it was found that the external hex type-joint model had greater movement than the taper type-joint model. The external hex joint-type model showed rotation movement, whereas the movement of the taper joint-type model showed no rotation. It was concluded that the nonlinear dynamic analysis used in this study clearly demonstrated the differences in rotation of components in dental implant systems with taper or external hex joints.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%