2005
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.30328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of implant/abutment joint designs on abutment screw loosening in a dental implant system

Abstract: The objective of this study was to investigate the influence of implant/abutment joint designs on abutment screw loosening in a dental implant system, using nonlinear dynamic analysis of the finite element method (FEM). This finite element simulation study used two dental implant systems: the Ankylos implant system (Degusa Dental, Hanau, German) with a taper joint (taper joint-type model), and the Bränemark implant system (Nobel Biocare, Gothenburg, Sweden) with an external hex joint (external hex joint-type m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
86
0
21

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
86
0
21
Order By: Relevance
“…Even its geometry and shape should ensure the primary stability (which is impossible for the high values of the cortical bone), the study results underline how the fixture and the abutment of this model have values of the average Von Mises voltage significantly above the fatigue limit of the material. This justifies, in part, the decision of Brand Production of replacing this model after a few years since the introduction in the market with a new "D model" concerned with a neck design completely different shape (24)(25)(26).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 93%
“…Even its geometry and shape should ensure the primary stability (which is impossible for the high values of the cortical bone), the study results underline how the fixture and the abutment of this model have values of the average Von Mises voltage significantly above the fatigue limit of the material. This justifies, in part, the decision of Brand Production of replacing this model after a few years since the introduction in the market with a new "D model" concerned with a neck design completely different shape (24)(25)(26).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 93%
“…On the other hand, the preload values should not be too low in order to retain loose screws under repeated functional forces 16 . Eccentric and compressive forces are generated during chewing movements and influence the screw retention 3,8,[17][18][19][20] . The optimal preload values for the implant/abutment screw joint have not been fully identified and in single tooth implants this value is critical for screw joint stability 21 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing the torque beyond 30 N may be beneficial for the stability of the implant-abutment and reduce the risk of loose screws (16,17). Furthermore, increased screwing torque in Morse taper connections improves their sealing capacity, since no contamination was observed for abutments tightened with a 40 N torque (18).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%