2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.07.100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Deep Learning techniques for Prognosis of solar thermal systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fortunately, Deep learning (DL) methods are promising approaches for learning the intrinsic non-linear characteristics and constant data patterns [43], [44]. DL methods are highly accurate energy forecasting models for modelling energy demand and supply due to their high performance in dealing with solid data regularity, and periodicity [14], [45]- [47]. In addition, DL methods are reliable for learning long-term dependencies of energy data, leading to accurate forecasting results.…”
Section: A Forecasting Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fortunately, Deep learning (DL) methods are promising approaches for learning the intrinsic non-linear characteristics and constant data patterns [43], [44]. DL methods are highly accurate energy forecasting models for modelling energy demand and supply due to their high performance in dealing with solid data regularity, and periodicity [14], [45]- [47]. In addition, DL methods are reliable for learning long-term dependencies of energy data, leading to accurate forecasting results.…”
Section: A Forecasting Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Torres et al [42] proposed an FFNN to predict the day ahead electricity generated by PV solar systems, while Kamadinata et al [43] forecasted the solar radiation from sky images using the ANN architecture. Similarly, Correa-Jullian et al [44] explored the techniques of ANN, RNN, and LSTM and found these methods reliable for solar energy prediction. AlKandari et al [45] used both ML and statistical methods for the prediction of future solar power generation in solar plants.…”
Section: Solar Power Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the same field, Yang et al [34] proved that compared to vector modelling, LSTM showed a higher predictive accuracy, faster response time, and stronger generalization capability. In the case of renewable resources, Correa-Jullian et al [36] compared the predictive methods based on standard neural networks and LSTM. The comparison showed that LSTM models achieve the lowest RMSE (Root Mean Square Error) error score, lowest standard deviation, and smallest relative error.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%