2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.05.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of debris flow hazards using a Bayesian Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, data mining techniques have been developed and are extremely popular [19,20] when dealing with a variety of nonlinear issues. Techniques applied in landslide susceptibility modeling include: artificial neural network, decision tree, boosted tree, neuro fuzzy, Bayesian network, support vector machine, and random forest [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, data mining techniques have been developed and are extremely popular [19,20] when dealing with a variety of nonlinear issues. Techniques applied in landslide susceptibility modeling include: artificial neural network, decision tree, boosted tree, neuro fuzzy, Bayesian network, support vector machine, and random forest [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, in that case we consider acceptable to add data on the magnitude of the studied characteristics, relevant increasing action of external agents, provoking catastrophic processes, or showing the morphosystem inner characteristics specificity (geomorphologic circumstances), also leading to increasing exogenous processes intensification. However, because of the different dimension and magnitude of the studied characteristics, the straight addition is not correct; thus, we, according to [Simonov, 1997;Liang at al., 2012], conducted "normalization" of the values by formula X' = (X -X min ):(X max -X min ), where Х is the real value of the characteristic, X max -X min is the range of its possible values, and X' -the normalized characteristic's value within the interval from 0 to 1. Also, for calculation convenience [Liang at al., 2012] we converted the fraction values into the whole values, and considered them as the relative tension points.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when the study area is large, application of these approaches may be difficult. Statistical analyses such as discriminant analysis [4,7], logistic regression [8,9], and Bayes learning [10,11], are deemed to be more suitable for geological hazard assessment in large and complex areas [12,13]. With the development of science and technology, soft computing techniques, such as data mining and artificial intelligence, have also been widely used in geological hazard assessment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Bayes learning algorithm is considered to be an effective tool for knowledge representation and reasoning under the influence of uncertainty [10]. Based on this algorithm, a recently developed machine learning technique, relevance vector machine (RVM), was originally introduced by Tipping [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%