2017
DOI: 10.1590/0001-3765201720160813
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of cow and farm level risk factors associated with Ureaplasma diversum in pasture-based dairy systems - A field study

Abstract: Potential risk factors for Ureaplasma diversum in the vaginal mucus of 1,238 dairy cows were included in a multivariate logistic regression model, based on the cow level (i.e., granular vulvovaginitis [+GVV], yearly milk production [4500 kg or more], pregnancy, predominance of Bos taurus [+Bos Taurus], score of corporal condition [at least 2.5], concomitant positivity for Escherichia coli [+E.coli]), and farm level i.e., milking room hygiene (-Milking room), dunghill location, and replacement female). Ureaplas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ureaplasma presented a relative abundance higher than 30%. Ureaplasma diversum has been previously reported in bovine vaginal microbiota in several countries including Brazil (26,27), France (28), Canada (29), Costa Rica (30), Argentina (31), Australia (32), and Spain (33). Particularly in Canada, U. diversum has been identified in the microbiota of the reproductive tract of cattle without clinical signs of granular vulvitis (29,34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Ureaplasma presented a relative abundance higher than 30%. Ureaplasma diversum has been previously reported in bovine vaginal microbiota in several countries including Brazil (26,27), France (28), Canada (29), Costa Rica (30), Argentina (31), Australia (32), and Spain (33). Particularly in Canada, U. diversum has been identified in the microbiota of the reproductive tract of cattle without clinical signs of granular vulvitis (29,34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Ureaplasma and Mycoplasma are very similar in structure and function, and both are linked to a variety of inflammatory diseases in cattle; their differences are in their colony formation structure, the fact that only Ureaplasma can secrete urease, and in the number of species they contain [57,58]. In contrast to over 120 identified Mycoplasma species, there are only 11 identified bovine Ureaplasma species, the best known species being Ureaplasma parvum, which is prevalent in many herds and linked to a high incidence of abortions (i.e., bovine ureaplasmosis) [57,59,60]. Distinct bacterial metacommunities inhabit the upper and lower respiratory tracts of healthy feedlot cattle and those diagnosed with bronchopneumonia [61].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Present results suggest that Mycoplasma bovigenitalium might be recognized by mononuclear cells as an aggressor faster than other mycoplasmas, what would explain his transitory effect. Our previously studies showed that vaginal samples positive for Mycoplasma bovigenitalium were always obtained from cows or heifers with a severe vaginal lesion score, denoting the acute form of the infection [7,6]. Mycoplasma bovigenitalium is described as a mastitis pathogen, and it has been suggested that the source for mastitis may be from infected vaginal discharge running down onto the udder and teats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of their capacity to colonize mucosal surfaces of the nose, eye, middle ear, vagina, and mammary gland [3] the dissemination between animals can occur via aerosolization of nasal secretions [4] or ingestion of contaminated colostrum or milk [5]. Of the risk factors related to their occurrence in dairy cattle the concomitant infection (Mycolasma spp and Ureaplasma diversum) presented the highest odds ratio (OR, 5.67, P< 0.00010 [6]. Histopathological changes in the uterus and vagina of heifers during natural infections are characterized by mononuclear cell infi ltrations, suggesting cellular response and stimulation of infl ammatory mediators [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%