2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2715-9_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Changes in Global DNA Methylation Levels by Pyrosequencing® of Repetitive Elements

Abstract: Transposable elements (TE) comprise half of the human genome. LINE-1 and ALU are the most common TE, and they have been used to assess changes in the DNA methylation of repetitive elements in response to intrinsic and extrinsic cellular events. Pyrosequencing(®) is a real-time sequencing technology that enables quantitative assessment of TE methylation at single-base resolution. In Pyrosequencing, a region of interest is first amplified from bisulfite-converted DNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), before PC… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
10
1
Order By: Relevance
“…DNMT1 is classically described as the "maintenance" methyltransferase, whereas DNMT3a and DNMT3b are responsible for de novo DNA methylation, but increasing evidence over the past several years has challenged this distinction and subverted this simplistic model (53). We did not observe a difference in LINE-1 methylation, which is often used to approximate global methylation (43), after TGF-␤1 treatment. DNA methylation of LINE-1 and other retrotransposon elements, however, do not encapsulate the methylation changes that might occur in other regions of the genome.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…DNMT1 is classically described as the "maintenance" methyltransferase, whereas DNMT3a and DNMT3b are responsible for de novo DNA methylation, but increasing evidence over the past several years has challenged this distinction and subverted this simplistic model (53). We did not observe a difference in LINE-1 methylation, which is often used to approximate global methylation (43), after TGF-␤1 treatment. DNA methylation of LINE-1 and other retrotransposon elements, however, do not encapsulate the methylation changes that might occur in other regions of the genome.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…TGF-␤1 has also been shown to increase the expression of collagen type I by inducing DNA methylation changes in cardiac fibroblasts (27). To determine whether global DNA methylation levels were affected by TGF-␤1 treatment, we assayed the DNA methylation of the retrotransposon LINE-1, which is frequently used to estimate global methylation (43). Bisulfite sequencing revealed no change in LINE-1 methylation after TGF-␤1 treatment (Fig.…”
Section: Tgf-␤1 Inhibited Dnmt1 Ubiquitination By Phosphorylating Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, LINE-1 retrotransposons retain ~80–100 copies throughout the human genome that remain capable of retrotransposition, but are epigenetically silenced in normal cells. LINE-1 demethylation has thus been used as a control measure for the induction of global hypomethylation by HMAs in a given experimental setting [7274]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No significant changes in the 5-mC levels were observed either. We subsequently studied the methylation levels of LINE-1 , which is considered a good indicator of global DNA methylation [ 34 ]. Sequence specific analysis of LINE-1 did not reveal significant changes in methylation, except for a single concentration of SWCNT (25 µg/ml) at a CpG position 3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sequence specific methylation of repetitive element ( LINE-1 ) and gene promoters ( SKI, DNMT 1, HDAC 4, NPAT/ATM, BCL2L11, MAP3K10, PIK3R2, MYO1C, TCF3, FGFR 1, AGRN ) were analyzed using bisulfite pyrosequencing, as described previously [ 34 ]. In addition to RNA sequencing results, we obtained the present set of genes based on our preliminary experiments in vitro (in THP-1 cells, 16 HBE) [ 28 , 29 ], in vivo [ 27 ] and human [ 17 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%