Hypomethylating agents (HMAs) have been widely used over the last decade, approved for use in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The proposed central mechanism of action of HMAs, is the reversal of aberrant methylation in tumor cells, thus reactivating CpG-island promoters and leading to (re)expression of tumor suppressor genes. Recent investigations into the mode of action of azacitidine (AZA) and decitabine (DAC) have revealed new molecular mechanisms that impinge on tumor immunity via induction of an interferon response, through activation of endogenous retroviral elements (ERVs) that are normally epigenetically silenced. Although the global demethylation of DNA by HMAs can induce anti-tumor effects, it can also upregulate the expression of inhibitory immune checkpoint receptors and their ligands, resulting in secondary resistance to HMAs. Recent studies have, however, suggested that this could be exploited to prime or (re)sensitize tumors to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies. In recent years, immune checkpoints have been targeted by novel therapies, with the aim of (re)activating the host immune system to specifically eliminate malignant cells. Antibodies blocking checkpoint receptors have been FDA-approved for some solid tumors and a plethora of clinical trials testing these and other checkpoint inhibitors are under way. This review will discuss AZA and DAC novel mechanisms of action resulting from the re-expression of pathologically hypermethylated promoters of gene sets that are related to interferon signaling, antigen presentation and inflammation. We also review new insights into the molecular mechanisms of action of transient, low-dose HMAs on various tumor types and discuss the potential of new treatment options and combinations.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a clonal disease caused by genetic abberations occurring predominantly in the elderly. Next generation sequencing (NGS) analysis has led to a deeper genetic understanding of the pathogenesis and the role of recently discovered genetic precursor lesions (clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate/oncogenic potential (CHIP/CHOP)) in the evolution of AML. These advances are reflected by the inclusion of certain mutations in the updated World Health Organization (WHO) 2016 classification and current treatment guidelines by the European Leukemia Net (ELN) and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and results of mutational testing are already influencing the choice and timing of (targeted) treatment. Genetic profiling and stratification of patients into molecularly defined subgroups are expected to gain ever more weight in daily clinical practice. Our aim is to provide a concise summary of current evidence regarding the relevance of NGS for the diagnosis, risk stratification, treatment planning and response assessment in AML, including minimal residual disease (MRD) guided approaches. We also summarize recently approved drugs targeting genetically defined patient populations with risk adapted- and individualized treatment strategies.

Plitidepsin is a marine-derived anticancer compound isolated from the Mediterranean tunicate Applidium albicans. It exerts pleiotropic effects on cancer cells, most likely by binding to the eukaryotic translation eEF1A2. This ultimately leads to cell-cycle arrest, growth inhibition and induction of apoptosis via multiple pathway alterations. Recently, a Phase III randomized trial in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma reported outcomes for plitidepsin plus dexamethasone compared with dexamethasone. Median progression-free survival was 3.8 months in the plitidepsin arm and 1.9 months in the dexamethasone arm (HR: 0.611; p = 0.0048). Here, we review preclinical data regarding plitidepsins mechanism of action, give an overview of clinical trial results across different tumor types as well as the latest results in multiple myeloma.

No abstract

Purpose: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) pathophysiology is characterized by a complex crosstalk of tumor cells with the microenvironment. In this regard, NF-kB signaling is considered as important signaling axis, with a variety of key molecules aberrantly expressed or genetically altered in patients with CLL. One of these molecules is BIRC3 (cIAP2), a central regulator of noncanonical NF-kB signaling that serves as pathway brake in the absence of microenvironmental signals. However, the contribution of BIRC3 expression to CLL progression and potential therapeutic implications is unknown. Experimental Design: We analyzed the role of BIRC3 mRNA expression in primary CLL samples in correlation to clinical datasets and used ex vivo assays to investigate functional consequences on the level of NF-kB signaling and downstream target gene regulation. For proof-of-principle experiments, we used genetically modified cell lines. Results: We demonstrate that patients with CLL with low BIRC3 expression experience a more rapid disease progression, which coincides with an enhanced activation of canonical NF-kB target genes evidenced by an increased p65/Rel-B nuclear translocation ratio. As a consequence of enhanced canonical NF-kB target gene activation, both anti-and proapoptotic Bcl-2 family members were upregulated in BIRC3 low primary CLL cells, which was associated with higher sensitivity to venetoclax treatment in vitro. Conclusions: Here we show the impact of BIRC3 expression in CLL disease progression in the absence of BIRC3 mutations and show altered canonical NF-kB target gene activation with therapeutic implications.