2004
DOI: 10.1002/j.1556-6678.2004.tb00338.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Bullying: A Review of Methods and Instruments

Abstract: Childhood bullying has become recognized as a significant, pervasive form of school violence. Because of its deleterious effect on both victims' and bullies' current and future functioning, it is imperative that school personnel such as counselors engage in assessment techniques as the 1st step in a coordinated, systemic antibullying effort. The authors discuss multiple methods and instruments to use in assessing bullying in schools and provide guidelines for counselors in choosing the appropriate measurement … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
76
1
14

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
76
1
14
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it is important to replicate our findings with multi-informant assessment, certainly in the domain of bullying and parental behavior. (Crothers and Levinson 2004), for example, advise to assess bullying by multiple informants and by means of multiple assessment methods in different contexts over a longer period of time. Thirdly, our analyses were based on cross-sectional data gathered at one point in time, which prevent us from determining the causal order of the events.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is important to replicate our findings with multi-informant assessment, certainly in the domain of bullying and parental behavior. (Crothers and Levinson 2004), for example, advise to assess bullying by multiple informants and by means of multiple assessment methods in different contexts over a longer period of time. Thirdly, our analyses were based on cross-sectional data gathered at one point in time, which prevent us from determining the causal order of the events.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por último encontramos opções metodológi-cas ao nível da aplicação de instrumentos de auto-preenchimento aos professores, sendo-lhes solicitado que identifiquem ou caracterizem os alunos que melhor correspondam ao perfil ou descrição referida nesses instrumentos. A desvantagem da utilização desta metodologia advém do facto de muitos comportamentos de bullying ocorrerem fora da sala de aula, de modo que os professores não se encontram em posição privilegiada para estarem atentos a todos os fenómenos de interacção interpessoal entre pares que ocorrem nos espaços exteriores à sala de aula, sendo as suas identificações o resultado das suas experiências com os alunos em contextos específicos (Crothers & Levinson, 2004;Menesini, Fonzi & Smith, 2002;Pellegrini & Bartini, 2000). Não obstante, assumem-se como uma fonte de informação adicional sobre competências sociais, alguns indicadores de ajustamento social, ou outros problemas de comportamento dos seus alunos.…”
Section: Instrumentos De Auto-preenchimento Pelos Alunosunclassified
“…To measure the frequency of bullying and victimization, the Iranian validated version (21) of Olweus bullying questionnaire (OBQ) (5,11,(22)(23)(24)(25)(26) was employed, which was reported reliable and valid. The obtained reliability and validity for 9 items of perpetrator bullying with Cronbach's Alpha was 0.81, and the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) with Varimax rotation revealed 4 factors solution explaining 73% of the total variance (forms of perpetrator bullying): verbal (3 items), relational (2 items), physical (2 items), and other forms (2 items), also the obtained reliability and validity for 10 items of victimization bullying with Cronbach's alpha was 0.80, and the EFA with Varimax rotation revealed 4 factors solution explaining 64% of the total variance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%