Assessment of BIM acceptance degree of Korean AEC participants

Kim, Seong-Ah; Park, Chan Ho; Chin, Sangyoon

doi:10.1007/s12205-015-0647-y

Cited by 41 publications

(27 citation statements)

References 37 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…BIM-adoption models at the user level have become prominent since 2014. Studies have been conducted in China (Ding et al 2015), India (Ahuja et al 2016, South Korea (Kim et al 2016;Park et al 2019), United Kingdom (Howard et al 2017), Australia (Sargent et al 2012), Thailand (Ngowtanasawan 2017), Malaysia (Enegbuma et al 2016), and the United States (Lee and Yu 2016).…”

Section: User-level Adoption Modelsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Research has mainly focused on BIM adoption by design and construction professionals. Moreover, the outcome variable of most studies is the 'Intention to Adopt BIM' (Ding et al 2015;Kim et al 2016;Park et al 2019;Sargent et al 2012;Son et al 2015). Nonetheless, other authors have examined actual BIM practice (Howard et al 2017;Ngowtanasawan 2017).…”

Section: User-level Adoption Modelsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Systemic BIM Adoption: A Multilevel Perspective

Murguia

Demian

Soetanto

2021

J. Constr. Eng. Manage.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Systemic innovations require multiple interdependent actors to change their practices simultaneously in order to realise the benefits of the innovation. Building Information Modelling (BIM) has been classified as a systemic innovation that is adopted by building projects, firms, and users. However, the slow diffusion of BIM in the Architecture, Engineering, and Construction (AEC) sector has maintained the gap between BIM visions and actual BIM practice. Some governments are planning to enact policies to promote BIM adoption in construction. However, in some countries, BIM adoption has already started with large construction organisations (i.e., the middle-out diffusion approach). To learn from previous experience and before enacting top-down interventions, policymakers require a model to stimulate systemic BIM adoption for entire supply chains with fragmented project and organisational structures. The current paper investigates systemic adoption of digital innovations in construction and is aimed at formulating a model of systemic BIM adoption (MSBA). Three primary datasets consisting of 133 BIM users, 30 chief executive officers, and 20 project managers were collected in Peru and collectively analysed using cross-classified multilevel modelling (CCMM). It was found that MSBA has five user-, three firm-, and two project-level factors, explaining 28%, 75% and 50% of variance in users' BIM adoption respectively. The proposed model would provide useful guidance for corporate decisionmakers and government policymakers to develop BIM-diffusion policies to accelerate adoption. It would also provide a useful practical implementation framework as the industry progresses towards a digital mode of working and could underpin further digitalisation of the sector worldwide.

show abstract

Section: User-level Adoption Modelsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: User-level Adoption Modelsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Systemic BIM Adoption: A Multilevel Perspective

Murguia

Demian

Soetanto

2021

J. Constr. Eng. Manage.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…More so some of these studies and research themes covered include: RC5.1 -"BIM usage and adoption" (Eadie et al 2013;Fortner 2008;Gilkinson et al 2015;Kim et al 2016d); RC5.2 -"BIM curriculum development" (Pikas et al 2013;Sampaio 2015;Solnosky et al 2014;Wu, Issa 2014); RC5.3 -"construction stakeholders' BIM adoption strategies" (Ahn et al 2016;Jung, Lee 2016;Salleh, Fung 2014;Xu et al 2014); RC5.4 -"BIM teaching and support" (Gnaur et al 2015;Kim 2012;Kovacic et al 2015;Sacks, Barak 2010); RC5.5 -"drivers of BIM adoption" (Mom et al 2014;Tsai et al 2014b); RC5.6 -"cost-benefit analysis of BIM implementations" (Giel, Issa 2013;Lu et al 2014).…”

Section: Bim Learning Adoption and Practice (Rc5)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Evolution in the Intellectual Structure of Bim Research: A Bibliometric Analysis

Olawumi

Chan

Wong

2017

Journal of Civil Engineering and Management

118

122

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Building Information Modelling (BIM) processes have continued to gain relevance in the Architectural, Engineering, and Construction (AEC) industry with more resources directed toward it. This study conducts a bibliometric analysis of 445 BIM articles to investigate and understand the pattern of BIM research which include defining BIM research categories, evaluating the project sectors that are influenced by BIM, and tracking the funding structure of BIM research. A network map that displays a visualization of the structure of BIM literature by research origin, funding structure and geographical scope was designed. None of the previous reviews of literature analyzed the BIM articles’ corpus to such level and depth. The findings revealed research categories such as construction and project management and BIM learning, adoption & practice as the core research areas in BIM and highlighted trending research themes in BIM research. Authors based in Asia and Europe received more research grants than their counterparts in other regions; likewise, two-third of the articles was authored by academics in the United States, Korea, and the United Kingdom. The study provides its readers with relevant research areas that require considerations, and the discussion of selected research areas provides an extensive understanding of salient BIM fields.

show abstract

“…Investigating BIM adoption at organisational level (Micro-level) has also attracted significant attention in recent years. Research has been focussed on three key areas: (a) understanding the process of BIM adoption and diffusion by proposing approaches for predicting BIM diffusion (Gledson, 2015) or investigating the diffusion phase that follows BIM adoption (Kim et al, 2015); (b) identifying the drivers and factors that affect innovation adoption (Waarts et al, 2002), and (c) investigating relationships between organisation characteristics (e.g., size, age, resources, etc.) and the inclination of organisations to adopt innovation (Oliveira et al, 2014).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A unified BIM adoption taxonomy: Conceptual development, empirical validation and application

Ahmed

Kassem

2018

Automation in Construction

114

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Building Information Modelling (BIM) is an innovation that is transforming practices within the Architectural, Engineering, Construction and Operation (AECO) sectors. Many studies have investigated the process of BIM adoption and diffusion and in particular, the drivers affecting adoption at different levels, ranging from individual and team through organisations and supply chains to whole market level. However, in-depth investigations of the stages of the BIM adoption process and the drivers, factors and determinants affecting such stages are still lacking. A comprehensive classification and integration of adoption drivers and factors is absent as these are disjointedly identified across disparate studies. There is also limited attention to the key terms and concepts (i.e. readiness, implementation, diffusion, adoption) in this area of study. This aim in this paper is twofold: (1) to develop and validate a Unified BIM Adoption Taxonomy (UBAT); and (2) to identify the taxonomy's constructs (i.e. three driver clusters and their 17 factors) that have influence on the first three stages of the BIM adoption process namely, awareness, interest, and decision stages, and compare their effects on each of the stages. The research uses: a systematic literature review and knowledge synthesisation to develop the taxonomy; a confirmatory factor analysis for its validation; and an ordinal logistic regression to test the effect of the UBAT's constructs on the BIM adoption process within the UK Architectural sector using a sample of 177 organisations. The paper is primarily intended to enhance the reader's understanding of the BIM adoption process and the constructs that influence its stages. The taxonomy and its sets of drivers and determinants can be used to perform various analyses of the BIM adoption process, delivering evidence and insights for decision makers within organisations and across whole market when formulating BIM diffusion strategies.

show abstract

Assessment of BIM acceptance degree of Korean AEC participants

Cited by 41 publications

References 37 publications

Systemic BIM Adoption: A Multilevel Perspective

Systemic BIM Adoption: A Multilevel Perspective

Evolution in the Intellectual Structure of Bim Research: A Bibliometric Analysis

A unified BIM adoption taxonomy: Conceptual development, empirical validation and application

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About