2017
DOI: 10.3846/13923730.2017.1374301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evolution in the Intellectual Structure of Bim Research: A Bibliometric Analysis

Abstract: Building Information Modelling (BIM) processes have continued to gain relevance in the Architectural, En­gineering, and Construction (AEC) industry with more resources directed toward it. This study conducts a bibliometric analysis of 445 BIM articles to investigate and understand the pattern of BIM research which include defining BIM research categories, evaluating the project sectors that are influenced by BIM, and tracking the funding structure of BIM research. A network map that displays a visualization of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
122
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(151 citation statements)
references
References 209 publications
6
122
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, for Factor c8—“information and knowledge sharing within the industry,” the median value of the academic group (9.29) is higher than those of the industry practitioners (5.71). The results show that the academic group perceived the CSFs to be more important than the practitioner group, and this is consistent with the findings of Olawumi et al () and Olawumi and Chan (), which reveal a broad and wider knowledge sharing and research network hub among the academics. Olawumi et al () further highlighted the robust networks among academic researchers across regions and countries, which had contributed to the substantial contribution to the construction industry through the development of tools and standards for BIM and sustainability.…”
Section: Discussion Of Results and Analysis Of Findingssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Meanwhile, for Factor c8—“information and knowledge sharing within the industry,” the median value of the academic group (9.29) is higher than those of the industry practitioners (5.71). The results show that the academic group perceived the CSFs to be more important than the practitioner group, and this is consistent with the findings of Olawumi et al () and Olawumi and Chan (), which reveal a broad and wider knowledge sharing and research network hub among the academics. Olawumi et al () further highlighted the robust networks among academic researchers across regions and countries, which had contributed to the substantial contribution to the construction industry through the development of tools and standards for BIM and sustainability.…”
Section: Discussion Of Results and Analysis Of Findingssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The results show that the academic group perceived the CSFs to be more important than the practitioner group, and this is consistent with the findings of Olawumi et al () and Olawumi and Chan (), which reveal a broad and wider knowledge sharing and research network hub among the academics. Olawumi et al () further highlighted the robust networks among academic researchers across regions and countries, which had contributed to the substantial contribution to the construction industry through the development of tools and standards for BIM and sustainability. However, the somewhat fierce competition and rivalry among related construction organizations inhibit the sharing of vital information that could enhance their projects.…”
Section: Discussion Of Results and Analysis Of Findingssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The requirement of data interoperability and integration affects all application areas of information management of tunnels in their design, construction and operation phases. The IFC standard (Industry Foundation Classes) is the most important format in the AEC industry (Architectural, Engineering and Construction) and with continuous development through buildingSMART ensures sustainable compatibility [6]. IFC is supported by an impressive number of different software products [7].…”
Section: Bim In Linear Infrastructure Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%