2017
DOI: 10.29252/nmce.2.2.63
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of bending solution of beam with arbitrary boundary conditions: an accurate comparison of various approaches

Abstract: Bending responses are the important characteristics of structures. In this paper, the bending solution of the thin and thick beams which are elastically restrained against rotation and translation are presented using various theories. Hence, accurate and direct modeling technique is offered for modeling of the thin and thick beams. The effect of the values of the span-to-depth ratio and type of the beam supports are assessed to state accurate comparison of various theories. Finally, the numerical examples are … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The support span is constant as 100 mm. The span/depth ratio of the beam specimen is 10, within the limit of Euler beam theory [59,60]. The mass of the middle holder is 68.4 g.…”
Section: Test Rigsmentioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The support span is constant as 100 mm. The span/depth ratio of the beam specimen is 10, within the limit of Euler beam theory [59,60]. The mass of the middle holder is 68.4 g.…”
Section: Test Rigsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The beam used in this work has a support span of 100 mm and thickness of 10 mm; therefore, the span to depth ratio is 10. A direct comparison between Euler and Timoshenko beams with different span to depth is done by Ghannadiasl et al by using theoretical modelling [59], and Gaur et al by using finite elements [60]. The two models provide very close results, with a * 2% difference of stiffness, when the span to depth ratio reaches 10 and the beam is simply supported at two ends.…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classical Euler-Bernoulli beam theory is usually used to analyze the behavior of structural elements because it can properly simulate the behavior of slender beams [21][22][23][24]. For slender beams, various studies have suggested that using Timoshenko beam theory can improve the accuracy of structural analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%