Assessment of Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) on the permanent dentition in a primary care setting in Nigeria

Ibiyemi, Olushola; Oo, Bankole; Oke, Gbemisola Aderemi

doi:10.1111/j.1875-595x.2011.00001.x

Cited by 9 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The study by Deepa and Shobha [33] reported an 89 % survival of 1-year-old multiple-surface ART restorations in the primary dentition, compared to the 71 % survival rate after 1 year resulting from the meta-analysis. Regarding single-surface ART restorations in the posterior permanent dentitions, one of the added studies showed a 2-year survival of 94 % [35], which is in line with the result from the latest meta-analysis on ART (93 %). The fourth included study is the longest run reported ART study [36].…”

Section: Survival Of Art Sealants and Art Glass-ionomer Restorationssupporting

confidence: 71%

Twenty-five-year atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach: a comprehensive overview

2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach was born 25 years ago in Tanzania. It has evolved into an essential caries management concept for improving quality and access to oral care globally. Results Meta-analyses and systematic reviews have indicated that the high effectiveness of ART sealants using high-viscosity glass ionomers in carious lesion development prevention is not different from that of resin fissure sealants. ART using high-viscosity glass ionomer can safely be used to restore single-surface cavities both in primary and in permanent posterior teeth, but its quality in restoring multiple surfaces in primary posterior teeth cavities needs to be improved. Insufficient information is available regarding the quality of ART restorations in multiple surfaces in permanent anterior and posterior teeth. There appears to be no difference in the survival of single-surface high-viscosity glass-ionomer ART restorations and amalgam restorations. Discussion The use of ART results in smaller cavities and in high acceptance of preventive and restorative care by children. Because local anaesthesia is seldom needed and only hand instruments are used, ART is considered to be a promising approach for treating children suffering from early childhood caries. ART has been implemented in the public oral health services of a number of countries, and clearly, proper implementation requires the availability of sufficient stocks of good high-viscosity glass ionomers and sets of ART instruments right from the start. Textbooks including chapters on ART are available, and the concept is being included in graduate courses at dental schools in a number of countries. Recent development and testing of e-learning modules for distance learning has increasingly facilitated the distribution of ART information amongst professionals, thus enabling more people to benefit from ART. However, this development and further research require adequate funding, which is not always easily obtainable. The next major challenge is the continuation of care to the frail elderly, in which ART may play a part. Conclusion ART, as part of the Basic Package of Oral Care, is an important cornerstone for the development of global oral health and alleviating inequality in oral care.

show abstract

Section: Survival Of Art Sealants and Art Glass-ionomer Restorationssupporting

confidence: 71%

Twenty-five-year atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach: a comprehensive overview

2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Na Fase 2, os textos completos dessas 53 referências foram recuperados e reavaliados e 17 referências foram mantidas. Após a discussão entre os autores e a releitura completa dos textos, nove artigos preencheram os critérios de elegibilidade e foram incluídos nesta revisão de escopo [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] . Nesta Fase 2, a concordância entre os autores foi máxima (Kappa = 1,00).…”

Section: Resultados Seleção De Estudosunclassified

Avaliação das taxas de sucesso de restaurações com cimento de ionômero de vidro de alta viscosidade durante o tratamento restaurador atraumático

Kimura

Abreu

2022

Arq Odontol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objetivo: Esta revisão de escopo teve como objetivo comparar a taxa de sucesso de restaurações confeccionadas com cinco marcas diferentes de Cimento de Ionômero de Vidro de Alta Viscosidade (CIVAV), referência no Tratamento Restaurador Atraumático (Atraumatic Restorative Treatment-ART). Métodos: Buscas no PubMed, Scopus e Web of Science foram feitas. Buscas no OpenGrey e no Google Scholar também foram feitas. Critérios de inclusão foram estudos (ensaios clínicos e estudos de acompanhamento) que avaliavam a taxa de sucesso de restaurações confeccionadas com CIVAV. Não houve restrição de idioma ou data. Título/resumo e texto completo das referências encontradas foram avaliados por dois autores. Referências que preencheram os critérios de inclusão foram selecionadas. Extração de dados foi feita. Modelos de regressão de Cox foram idealizados para comparação da probabilidade de sucesso das restaurações com diferentes tipos de CIVAV. Os resultados foram relatados em razão das chances (RC) e intervalos de confiança (IC). Análises de Kaplan Meyer foram feitas para o cálculo da probabilidade de sucesso de restaurações com CIVAV. Resultados: Nove artigos avaliando o ChemFil Rock, ChemFlex, Equia Fil, Ketac Molar ou Fuji IX foram incluídos. Restaurações com cimentos de ionômero de vidro Fuji IX (RC = 3,51; IC = 1,96 – 6,28), Ketac Molar (RC = 4,01; IC = 2,40-6,68) e ChemFlex (RC = 4,20; IC = 1,01-17,66) apresentaram uma taxa de sucesso significativamente maior do que aquelas com ChemFil Rock. EquiaFil alcançou a segunda menor eficácia, ligeiramente maior que o ChemFil Rock. Conclusão: Restaurações com Fuji IX, Ketac Molar e ChemFlex apresentaram altas taxas de sucesso ao longo do tempo de avaliação do ART.

show abstract

“…Thus, these events strongly contributed to the dissemination of the technique in Brazil. 9 Bonifácio et al 2013 11 Brazil For permanent dentition, the results are also satisfactory, Ibiyemi et al 26 obtained survival rates of 99.3% and 93.5% after 1 and 2 years, respectively, while the main cause of failure was partial or total loss of the restoration.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 98%

Desempenho clínico do cimento de ionômero de vidro no tratamento restaurador atraumático: uma revisão da literatura

Alves

Passos

Morais

et al. 2018

Rev. Bras. Odontol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: this study aimed to review of the literature regarding the clinical performance of glass ionomer cements (GIC) used in atraumatic restorative treatment (ART). Material and Methods: a search was undertaken using the databases of the Virtual Health Library of Dentistry, Medline, Pubmed, Science Direct and Cochrane Library, using keywords "Glass Ionomer Cements", "Dental Atraumatic Restorative Treatment", and "Survival Analysis". 25 articles published in the last ten years in English or in Portuguese fulfilled the predetermined inclusion criteria. Results: most of the studies applied the ART approach in children (68%), in the primary dentition (60%) and in single and multiple surfaces (44%), simultaneously. The high-viscosity GIC was the most used type and Fuji IX and Ketac Molar were the most studied brands in the ART technique. The majority of studies followed the clinical performance of the restorations in the period of 12 (36%) and 24 months (32%). Overall, survival rates of restorations ranged from 57.5% to 98% for single surface and from 24.4% to 97.8% for multiple surfaces. Conclusion: the association between GIC and the ART approach demonstrates a feasible alternative to treat caries in primary and permanent dentition. The GIC presents superior long-term performance for single surface ART restorations compared to multiple surfaces ART restorations. This approach proved to be reliable and effective when compared to the conventional restorative technique. The marginal defect and the partial or complete material loss were identified as the main causes of failure.

show abstract

Assessment of Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) on the permanent dentition in a primary care setting in Nigeria

Abstract: ART was shown to be acceptable and effective in the management of single surface occlusal caries in the permanent dentition in these Nigerian children and adolescents outside the traditional clinical setting.

Cited by 9 publications

References 15 publications

Twenty-five-year atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach: a comprehensive overview

Twenty-five-year atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) approach: a comprehensive overview

Avaliação das taxas de sucesso de restaurações com cimento de ionômero de vidro de alta viscosidade durante o tratamento restaurador atraumático

Desempenho clínico do cimento de ionômero de vidro no tratamento restaurador atraumático: uma revisão da literatura

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About