2009
DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2009.2022271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of Atmospheric Propagation Effects in SAR Images

Abstract: A test case showing a comparison of TerraSAR-X and ground-based weather radar data acquired nearly simultaneously (within the same minute) over New York City. A good agreement between rain-cell signatures in (left) the SAR image and (right) the weather radar image can be observed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
42
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3). Nevertheless, due to the mountainous topography and to the high degree of humidity that characterize the Azorean Islands, backscattering intensity and interferometric coherence [van Zyl, 1993;van Zyl et al, 1993;Castel et al, 2002;Danklmayer et al, 2009] are affected when using Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) sensors in this type of environments. That's the reason why the Sentinel 1 Mission (high-resolution microwave imaging) products could not represent an effective and fully reliable solution in order to be integrated and implemented into the "GMES Azorean Regional Framework".…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3). Nevertheless, due to the mountainous topography and to the high degree of humidity that characterize the Azorean Islands, backscattering intensity and interferometric coherence [van Zyl, 1993;van Zyl et al, 1993;Castel et al, 2002;Danklmayer et al, 2009] are affected when using Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) sensors in this type of environments. That's the reason why the Sentinel 1 Mission (high-resolution microwave imaging) products could not represent an effective and fully reliable solution in order to be integrated and implemented into the "GMES Azorean Regional Framework".…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A previous research by Hanssen et al (2001) mentioned that, in case of SAR interferometry with higher radar frequency such as X-band and C-band, strong absorption of microwave energy due to severe cloud cover is likely to occur, resulting in missing observation under such a situation. On the other hand, L-band SAR interferometry is little attenuated by cloud hydrometeors (Danklmayer et al 2009). This cloud-free characteristic is one of the advantages of L-band InSAR among other vertically integrated water vapor observation techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differential Synthetic Aperture RADAR Interferometry or DInSAR is used in remote sensing for measuring Earth surface deformation (Doin et al, 2009). This technique is considered more accurate than InSAR as it is capable of providing relative measures up to few centimetres or less (Danklmayer et al, 2009). When an interferogram is formed from two SAR images, and a Digital elevation Model (DEM) to simulate and remove phase changes due to topography, a new phase image is formed (Gabriel et al, 1989).…”
Section: Atmospheric Effects On Insarmentioning
confidence: 99%