2017
DOI: 10.1109/lawp.2016.2631889
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of a Millimeter-Wave Antenna System for MIMO Radar Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5. A detailed description of the measurement setup and procedure can be found in [8] and it is here omitted to avoid duplications.…”
Section: Examples and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…5. A detailed description of the measurement setup and procedure can be found in [8] and it is here omitted to avoid duplications.…”
Section: Examples and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 due to the complexity of the model, only one transmitter-receiver pair has been simulated; then it has been assumed that these results are valid for all the pairs. Considering that in [8] it has been proved that when identical antennas are employed, the properties of the AF depends only on the geometrical displacement of the arrays and not on their radiation pattern, it is unnecessary to use the full-wave simulation results for the calculation of the AF, since the same results as the isotropic case are expected.…”
Section: Examples and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For certain applications and under specific conditions, the information about certain parameters of an antenna are required, such as the radiation pattern at certain frequency or frequency range. Depending on the approach and the method applied, it might result in a complex and expensive task, as high-end equipment is required [1] and in occasions an anechoic chamber too [2] [3]. In cases where an anechoic chamber is not available, the measurements can take place in open spaces [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%