2015
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/6/2475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of a fully 3D Monte Carlo reconstruction method for preclinical PET with iodine-124

Abstract: Iodine-124 is a radionuclide well suited to the labeling of intact monoclonal antibodies. Yet, accurate quantification in preclinical imaging with I-124 is challenging due to the large positron range and a complex decay scheme including high-energy gammas. The aim of this work was to assess the quantitative performance of a fully 3D Monte Carlo (MC) reconstruction for preclinical I-124 PET. The high-resolution small animal PET Inveon (Siemens) was simulated using GATE 6.1. Three system matrices (SM) of differe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(52 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference between the point spread functions may lead to errors for MAP reconstructions of I-124 PET on Siemens Inveon PET scanners. Recently, Moreau and colleagues calculated the system matrix for the reconstruction of I-124 [15]. When these derived system matrices of I-124 were implemented on a Siemens Inveon PET scanner, the resulting spatial resolution with MAP reconstruction was improved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference between the point spread functions may lead to errors for MAP reconstructions of I-124 PET on Siemens Inveon PET scanners. Recently, Moreau and colleagues calculated the system matrix for the reconstruction of I-124 [15]. When these derived system matrices of I-124 were implemented on a Siemens Inveon PET scanner, the resulting spatial resolution with MAP reconstruction was improved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome the limitations induced by the PR effects, several PR correction (PRC) methods have been proposed ( Derenzo, 1986 ; Bai et al, 2003 ; Rahmim et al, 2008 ; Fu and Qi, 2010 ; Kraus et al, 2012 ; Cal-González et al, 2015 ; Moreau et al, 2015 ; Bertolli et al, 2016 ), most of which assume a spatially uniform Gaussian PR distribution ( Derenzo, 1986 ). However, fewer, yet more realistic approaches, consider a heterogeneous tissue-dependent distribution following an isotropic Gaussian distribution within a specific tissue ( Bai et al, 2003 ; Alessio and MacDonald, 2008 ; Cal-González et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%