Assessment of a Country’s Regional Economic Development on the Basis of Estimation of a Single Process (ESP) Method

Ginevičius, Romualdas; Gedvilaitė, Dainora; Bruzgė, Šarūnas

doi:10.15678/eber.2015.030210

Cited by 16 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…(3), where: i=1, 2…N; j=1, 2…, p (N is the number of entities (county), p -(number of features)means the unitarised value of the feature for a studied unit, zijmeans the value of the j th feature for a studied unit, maxmaximal value of the j th feature, minminimal value of the j th feature (Ginevičius, Gedvilaitė, & Bruzgė, 2015;Trojak, Tokarski, 2013). Synthetic measurement (3) allows measuring the distance brought to the range [0;1] in the real space with the Euclidean metric of the i th community in the year t from a hypothetical model community.…”

Section: Methodology and Theoretical Basismentioning

confidence: 99%

Synthetic Measurement Used as Assessment of Spatial Disparities of the Natural Environment

Przybytniowski

Dziekański

2020

znadministracja

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

One of important factors of attractiveness of a region is its natural environment, namely a set of natural elements which are of interest to a tourist. In terms of economy, it is a source of raw materials and energy, it ensures geographical space, business opportunities and a place to live and relax. The aim of the research included in this article is to indicate the possibility of using synthetic measurement to recognize spatial disparities of the natural environment on the basis of selected diagnostic features of 102 municipalities of the Świętokrzyskie Voivodeship. The data presented in this article refer to 2009, 2012 and 2015 and come from the Local Data Bank. The following variables were selected: the total use of household water per one inhabitant, the distribution network per 100 km2 - water pipe system, the distribution network per 100 km2 – sewage system, woodland area, areas protected by law, protected monuments. The elements indicated refer to entities which function and operate in a territorial unit. The methods presented enable us to identify areas of human life (or human impact on the environment) of higher/lower efficiency (which depends on the level of synthetic measure) and, then, programme their support from public funds within the framework of the regional policy.

show abstract

Section: Methodology and Theoretical Basismentioning

confidence: 99%

Synthetic Measurement Used as Assessment of Spatial Disparities of the Natural Environment

Przybytniowski

Dziekański

2020

znadministracja

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The qualitative assessment of the standing is limited because this case makes it impossible to compare the cost system aimed at improving the functioning of a system with the scope of improvements achieved. Therefore, two methods for a quantitative assessment of complex phenomena, which manifest in a variety of aspects in reality, have been developed in the recent years (Ginevičius et al, 2015(Ginevičius et al, , 2016Mardani et al, 2015;Zhou et al, 2007;Zavadskas et al, 2014).…”

Section: Existing Methods For Assessing the Standing Of Ses Developmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…If the objective is to determine the ranking of SES options (for instance, rank the regions across the country by their social-economic development), it looks as follows: Provided the objective of a multicriteria assessment is to assess the standing of development of an individual SES, the normalised values of indicators must be determined outside of the context in terms of the values of the same indicator in respect of other options. In such event, the normalisation is carried out in the following way (Ginevičius et al, 2015): A multicriteria assessment of the economic development across Lithuanian regions has been carried out based on the afore-mentioned methodology. It has been performed using the SAW method (Hwang, Yoon, 1981):…”

Section: Existing Methods For Assessing the Standing Of Ses Developmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This is necessary because experts are able to assess the weight of only a limited number of indicators (Ginevičius, 2009;Ginevičius et al, 2015Ginevičius et al, , 2016. Based on the available statistical information, it has been determined that 19 indicators give an indication of the regional economic development.…”

Section: Existing Methods For Assessing the Standing Of Ses Developmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Integrated Assessment of the Socioeconomic Systems’ Development

Ginevičius¹,

Gedvilaitė²,

Stasiukynas³

et al. 2018

Economics &Amp; Sociology

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ABSTRACT.A permanent property applicable to every socioeconomic system (SES) is its development. SES development is an integrated process with two sides that can be distinguished, i.e. quantitative and qualitative ones. The quantitative side reflects its static aspect, i.e. the state of the development at a certain point in time. The qualitative side of development reflects its dynamics, i.e. the scope of development changes. In order to make an integrated assessment of the standing of SES development, both these aspects above have to be assessed in a quantitative manner and be further combined into one generalised value. These days, assessment of the standing of SES development is limited to evaluation of the achieved level only, i.e. its quantitative assessment. Due to the fact that all socioeconomic systems are always large and complex systems, they tend to have a multitude of aspects. The indicators that reflect such aspects form a system thereof. It is thus the basis for further multicriteria assessment of the development state. In order to reduce the number of indicators to be assessed simultaneously so that experts could establish the weights thereof in a sufficiently accurate manner, a hierarchically structured system of indicators is developed and presented here. Following this methodology, the level of economic development across Lithuanian regions has been determined. When the scope of development changes was established on that basis, the integrated indicator of the regional development state was calculated following the proposed formula. On the basis of the correlation-regression analysis, it has been determined that the scope of development changes is larger in the regions with lower level of development achieved.

show abstract

“…In this case, the normalization of the initial data can be performed by the formula (Ginevičius, Podvezko 2006;Ginevičius et al 2015):…”

Section: Methodology Of Local Government Revenue Indexmentioning

confidence: 99%

Revenue Autonomy of Local Government: Fiscal Decentralization Aspect

Slavinskaitė

Ginevičius

2016

9th International Scientific Conference “Business and Management 2016”

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. The empriral studies of fiscal decentralization depend critically on the correct measurement of fiscal decentralization. Fiscal decentralization is an important aspect of fiscal institutions in both developing and developed countries. One of the most important aspect of fiscal decentralization is revenue autonomy of local government. In this paper we calculated an index of revenue autonomy for selected Europe countries. The most important indicator is tax autonomy in revenue autonomy of local govenment, which based on the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) methodology. The empirical results show that, in general, the degree of local government revenue autonomy is higher in developed Europe countries than in most developing Europe countries.

show abstract

Assessment of a Country’s Regional Economic Development on the Basis of Estimation of a Single Process (ESP) Method

Cited by 16 publications

References 22 publications

Synthetic Measurement Used as Assessment of Spatial Disparities of the Natural Environment

Synthetic Measurement Used as Assessment of Spatial Disparities of the Natural Environment

Integrated Assessment of the Socioeconomic Systems’ Development

Revenue Autonomy of Local Government: Fiscal Decentralization Aspect

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About