2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2020.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment of a Clinical Trial Metric for Rett Syndrome: Critical Analysis of the Rett Syndrome Behavioural Questionnaire

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The MECP2 mutations R168X and T158M were the most frequent in both studies. The RSBQ results were similar to the score distribution reported by Hou et al (2020). In the future, by obtaining accurate information on gene testing from sources other than the parents, it will be possible to investigate the relationship between genes and the presence of an intervention.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The MECP2 mutations R168X and T158M were the most frequent in both studies. The RSBQ results were similar to the score distribution reported by Hou et al (2020). In the future, by obtaining accurate information on gene testing from sources other than the parents, it will be possible to investigate the relationship between genes and the presence of an intervention.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The search for quantitative biomarkers is instrumental in complex heterogenic rare diseases, like RTT or MDS, especially those biomarkers that could be informative at early stages or used to monitor disease progression and the effect of treatments in clinical trials, as clinical severity scores are not optimal outcome measures [32,47,48]. In particular, the identification of reliable biomarkers for RTT early screening can contribute to a prompt genetic diagnostic, as the main age at RTT diagnosis is 24 months due to the apparently normal development that precedes the onset of overt symptoms [49].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clinical trials have mainly focused on RTT patients [31], as the first MDS patients were reported in 2005. To date, only a few trials revealed significant improvements, and one of the reported drawbacks was that clinical severity scores were not optimal outcome measures [32]. Thus, the identification of unbiased quantitative biomarkers that correlate with clinical and/or quality of life data could add great value to the current measures, not only for the follow-up of disease progression in clinical trials but also for aiding early disease diagnosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 The evaluation of the content validity of the CCSA-Clinician lays a strong foundation to then assess reliability and other aspects of validity. The CCSA-Clinician is ready for formal field testing and stands apart from other severity scales previously developed but not content validated, such as the severity assessments for RTT, 24 -28 FOXG1, 29,30 tuberous sclerosis 31 and other DEEs. 32 Other severity assessments have been content validated with a form that rated items on relevance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%