2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2012.01298.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment Issues in Languages for Specific Purposes

Abstract: While Grosse and Voght (1991) set out a well-considered overview of LSP and identified areas in need of development, they limited their observations on the topic of assessment to a short section devoted to what they called the proficiency movement. While it is true that they really did not have a lot to report on at the time they wrote their review, and that this current review highlights much interesting work done in the area in the intervening years, there remains a considerable emphasis on practice rather t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(82 reference statements)
0
3
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Ključne teme, ki so se jim posvečali oziroma se jim posvečajo raziskovalci, izhajajo iz osnovnih posebnosti in dilem, ki spremljajo poučevanje jezika stroke, to pa so odnos oziro ma interakcija med jezikovnim znanjem in znanjem stroke, vpliv nejezikovnih dejavnikov in uporaba avtentičnih oblik ocenjevanja znanja. Med novejše teme, ki zanimajo raziskoval ce, lahko uvrstimo problematiko kriterijev ocenjevanja znanja (Jacoby in McNamara, 1999;Douglas, 2000Douglas, , 2001, kar se je posebej izpostavilo z vključevanjem alternativnih metod ocenjevanja (Douglas, 2001;O'Sullivan, 2012), v tem kontekstu še posebej primerljivost ocen (ang. inter rater reliability).…”
Section: Uvodunclassified
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Ključne teme, ki so se jim posvečali oziroma se jim posvečajo raziskovalci, izhajajo iz osnovnih posebnosti in dilem, ki spremljajo poučevanje jezika stroke, to pa so odnos oziro ma interakcija med jezikovnim znanjem in znanjem stroke, vpliv nejezikovnih dejavnikov in uporaba avtentičnih oblik ocenjevanja znanja. Med novejše teme, ki zanimajo raziskoval ce, lahko uvrstimo problematiko kriterijev ocenjevanja znanja (Jacoby in McNamara, 1999;Douglas, 2000Douglas, , 2001, kar se je posebej izpostavilo z vključevanjem alternativnih metod ocenjevanja (Douglas, 2001;O'Sullivan, 2012), v tem kontekstu še posebej primerljivost ocen (ang. inter rater reliability).…”
Section: Uvodunclassified
“…Skoraj vsi brez izjeme so po osnovni izobrazbi jezikoslovci in morajo svoje znanje splošnega tujega jezika sami nadgraditi z znanjem vsakokratne stroke (na primer ekonomije, strojništva, etnologije itd.). Glede na to, da strokovne vsebine in zlasti terminologija predstavljajo vsebinsko jedro pouka tujih jezikov stroke in posledično tudi ocenjevanja znanja, je torej v literaturi pogosto izpostavlje no vprašanje, ali je učitelj TJS za to sploh usposobljen (McNamara in Ryan, 2011;O'Sullivan, 2012). Ta učiteljev specifični položaj se odraža v celotnem pedagoškem procesu in s tem tudi v ocenjevanju znanja.…”
Section: Posebnosti Ocenjevanja Znanja Pri Tujih Jezikih Stroke V Visokem šOlstvuunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The relevance of NA for the courses and examinations of LSP was claimed decades ago. Since then, NA has been not only extensively implemented and researched, but also questioned and reshaped (Hutchinson & Waters, 1987;Dudley-Evans & St John, 1998;Fulcher, 1999;Douglas, 2001;Long, 2005;O'Sullivan, 2012;Brunfaut, 2014). The LSP exam developers have often been careful to base their construction and administration process on the results obtained from interviews and surveys targeting different categories of stakeholders, consultations with experts or observation at the workplace.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increase in migration globally and to Canada comes with a multitude of complex issues that require a change in thinking and, very likely, an interdisciplinary approach (Saville, 2009). Moreover, "when conceptualizing a test-in-context, we should take all elements of the context into account" (O'Sullivan, 2021a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%