1999
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9647.00039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment for the Right Reason The Ethics of Outcomes Assessment

Abstract: This essay explores and challenges the two primary ethical arguments for assessment, accountability, and professional responsibility, by demonstrating their strengths and exposing their weaknesses, which are rooted in their limited notions of community, contract, and guild respectively. In contrast,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently there are faculty who are strong proponents of learning outcomes based education (for example, Carpenter and Bach 2010), some who simply try to work constructively within it (Fensham 2009; Lincoln 2010), and various educators who are receptive but not without significant reservations (Glennon 1999). Still others are much more critical, and understand the emphasis upon outcomes and their assessment to be either a fad and a waste of time (Pontuso and Thornton 2008), a dimension of the narrowing of the value of education to the purely economic (Berger 2008; Michaud 2010), a violation of trust in the professor who is constantly assessing his or her students anyway (Primo Ventello 2010), a potential if not real threat to academic freedom (Elmore 2010), and increasingly, a labor issue (Champagne 2011).…”
Section: Learning Outcomes and Academic Capitalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently there are faculty who are strong proponents of learning outcomes based education (for example, Carpenter and Bach 2010), some who simply try to work constructively within it (Fensham 2009; Lincoln 2010), and various educators who are receptive but not without significant reservations (Glennon 1999). Still others are much more critical, and understand the emphasis upon outcomes and their assessment to be either a fad and a waste of time (Pontuso and Thornton 2008), a dimension of the narrowing of the value of education to the purely economic (Berger 2008; Michaud 2010), a violation of trust in the professor who is constantly assessing his or her students anyway (Primo Ventello 2010), a potential if not real threat to academic freedom (Elmore 2010), and increasingly, a labor issue (Champagne 2011).…”
Section: Learning Outcomes and Academic Capitalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Active, student‐centered learning strategies promised a new direction (Barr and Tagg 1995). Moreover, I wanted to encourage such values as freedom, responsibility, and community among my students – values that are foundational to the tradition of covenant community that shapes my worldview (see Glennon 1999, 19–20). In its best communal sense, the covenant tradition recognizes the value of all persons and seeks to generate a community that enables and requires the participation and contributions of all members.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%