1974
DOI: 10.1177/000306517402200305
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessment and Follow-up in Psychoanalysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These observations have been confirmed by Schlessinger and Robbins' (1974) study, and by us. The Pfeffer approach elicited from former patients phenomena ordinarily thought to be limited to an ongoing psychoanalytic treatment process.…”
supporting
confidence: 78%
“…These observations have been confirmed by Schlessinger and Robbins' (1974) study, and by us. The Pfeffer approach elicited from former patients phenomena ordinarily thought to be limited to an ongoing psychoanalytic treatment process.…”
supporting
confidence: 78%
“…In contrast to some previous follow-up studies in psychoanalysis, we have not used the kind of psychoanalytic follow-up interviews used by Pfeffer (1959Pfeffer ( , 1961Pfeffer ( , 1963 and others after him (Leuzinger-Bohleber et al 2003;Oremland, Blacker, and Norman 1975;Schlessinger and Robbins 1974). The Pfeffer approach seems to foster regression in the interview situation, which may turn the follow-up study into a kind of mini-analysis (Ticho 1967).…”
Section: Methodological Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Self‐analysis is made up of several capacities developed in psychoanalysis and is the result of certain ways of analyzing (Busch, 2007). A number of analysts (Curtis, 1979; Goldberg, 1994; Schlesinger and Wolitzky, 2002; Schlessinger and Robbins, 1974) seem to view the path to self‐analysis as a by‐product of analysis (i.e. an identification with the analyst).…”
Section: Self‐analysismentioning
confidence: 99%