2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10531-021-02164-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing woodpeckers as indicators of bird diversity and habitat structure in managed forests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though many of the randomly drawn species groups performed better as an indicator than titmice, in France, the species sets included in those random species groups cannot be observed as easily as titmice. Similarly, other commonly used indicator bird species groups, such as woodpeckers (Menon & Shahabuddin, 2021; Mikusiński et al, 2001) or cuckoos (Møller et al, 2017), are relatively less abundant and diverse, and more habitat specialized than many titmouse species, potentially making them less suitable indicators for forest bird abundances. Titmice have many features of a suitable ecological indicator group: cost‐efficient observations, well‐known biology, conspicuous behavior, almost global distribution (Caro & O'Doherty, 1999; del Hoyo et al, 2007; Gill et al, 2005; Landres et al, 1988), and ecological traits broadly overlapping with those of a wide range of the target species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Even though many of the randomly drawn species groups performed better as an indicator than titmice, in France, the species sets included in those random species groups cannot be observed as easily as titmice. Similarly, other commonly used indicator bird species groups, such as woodpeckers (Menon & Shahabuddin, 2021; Mikusiński et al, 2001) or cuckoos (Møller et al, 2017), are relatively less abundant and diverse, and more habitat specialized than many titmouse species, potentially making them less suitable indicators for forest bird abundances. Titmice have many features of a suitable ecological indicator group: cost‐efficient observations, well‐known biology, conspicuous behavior, almost global distribution (Caro & O'Doherty, 1999; del Hoyo et al, 2007; Gill et al, 2005; Landres et al, 1988), and ecological traits broadly overlapping with those of a wide range of the target species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using indicator species has yielded promising results in community ecology (Caro & O'Doherty, 1999 ; Fleishman et al, 2005 ; Menon & Shahabuddin, 2021 ; Sattler et al, 2013 ). The most effective ecological indicators are usually species that are closely related to the target species (Fleishman et al, 2005 ; Sattler et al, 2013 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The weak effects of green cover in our study points to the importance of street g trees in providing fruit to the frugivores: they appear to be able to utilise fruiting resources even in densely inhabited residential areas located away from urban woodlands and parks. Further, birds could also be responding to green cover over much larger scales than 200 m radius, as seen in numerous forest studies, or landscape-scale effects on birds may weaken under heavy urbanization, as observed in wetland habitats in Delhi (Menon and Shahabuddin 2021;Rawal et al 2021). Frugivores such as the Red-vented Bulbul, Red-whiskered Bulbul and the Rose-ringed Parakeet are far more adaptable, being found in residential gardens and fallows in addition to parks and suburban forests; expectedly their visitation rates did not show much correlation with green cover.…”
Section: Landscape Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%