2003
DOI: 10.1080/1365881031000114071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing vulnerability to earthquake hazards through spatial multicriteria analysis of urban areas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
163
0
5

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 273 publications
(169 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
163
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…(Jenelius, 2009, Jenelius, 2010, Berdica, 2002, Rashed and Weeks, 2003, Taylor and Susilawati, 2012, Brenkert and Malone, 2005, arising from different interpretations of the concept of vulnerability and the scope of analysis. In general there are two main methods; use of a network wide screen (Jenelius et al, 2006) and techniques based on pre-selection of potentially vulnerable links according to a set of of criteria (Knoop et al, 2012).…”
Section: Vulnerability Assessment Methods and Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Jenelius, 2009, Jenelius, 2010, Berdica, 2002, Rashed and Weeks, 2003, Taylor and Susilawati, 2012, Brenkert and Malone, 2005, arising from different interpretations of the concept of vulnerability and the scope of analysis. In general there are two main methods; use of a network wide screen (Jenelius et al, 2006) and techniques based on pre-selection of potentially vulnerable links according to a set of of criteria (Knoop et al, 2012).…”
Section: Vulnerability Assessment Methods and Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Integration of fuzzy logic with GIS in a decision-making framework has been used for different purposes, including land suitability based upon soil profiles (Burrough et al 1992), soil classification (Lark and Bolam 1997), landfill site screening (Charnpratheep et al 1997), soil erosion (Mitra et al 1998), crop land suitability analysis (Ahmed et al 2000), ranking burned forests to evaluate the risk of desertification (Sasikala and Petrou 2001), seeking optimum locations for real estate (Zeng and Zhou 2001), assessing vulnerability to natural hazards (Rashed and Weeks 2003;Tangestani 2004;Dixon 2005), estimating risk (Sadiq and Husain 2005), incorporating farmer's knowledge for land suitability classification (Sicat et al 2005), fuel type mapping (Nadeau and Englefield 2006), assessing spatial extent of dry land salinity (Malins and Metternicht 2006), etc. Therefore, many studies have been performed using fuzzy logic integrated with GIS in a MCDM framework demonstrating that the methods are robust and valid.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this type of analysis could be extended for larger regions as was done for county-level data in Cutter et al [2003]. For the purposes of this paper, we focus on social vulnerability rather than economic vulnerability due to the cost of reconstruction or other commonly considered metrics by literature related to earthquake risk and loss [e.g., Rashed and Weeks, 2003]. …”
Section: Constructing a Social Vulnerability Index For Los Angelesmentioning
confidence: 99%