Assessing the value of cooperation and information exchange in large water resources systems by agent‐based optimization

Abstract

[1] Many large-scale water resources systems, especially in transboundary contexts, are characterized by the presence of several and conflicting interests and managed by multiple, institutionally independent decision makers. These systems are often studied adopting a centralized approach based on the assumption of full cooperation and information exchange among the involved parties. Such a perspective is conceptually interesting to quantify the best achievable performance but might have little practical impact given the real political and institutional setting. In this work, we propose a novel decision-analytic framework based on multiagent systems to model and analyze different levels of cooperation and information exchange among multiple decision makers. The Zambezi River basin is used as a case study. According to the proposed agent-based optimization approach, each agent represents a decision maker, whose decisions are defined by an explicit optimization problem considering only the agent's local interests. The economic value of information exchange is estimated comparing a noncooperative setting, where agents act independently, with the first basic level of cooperation, i.e., coordination, characterized by full information exchange. The economic value of cooperation is also estimated by comparison with the ideal, fully cooperative management of the system. Results show that coordination, obtained with complete information exchange, allows the downstream agents to better adapt to the upstream behaviors. The impact of information exchange depends on the objective considered, and we show coordination to be particularly beneficial to environmental interests.Citation: Giuliani, M., and A. Castelletti (2013), Assessing the value of cooperation and information exchange in large water resources systems by agent-based optimization, Water Resour. Res., 49,[3912][3913][3914][3915][3916][3917][3918][3919][3920][3921][3922][3923][3924][3925][3926]

Optimal Operation of the Multireservoir System in the Seine River Basin Using Deterministic and Ensemble Forecasts

“…As suggested by Dorchies et al (2014), the current management efficiency could be improved by a centralized and anticipatory management strategy. In centralized management, operational decisions at each location are optimized simultaneously considering the overall response of the multi-reservoir system, potentially leading to a strong increase in the system performances (see for instance Anghileri et al, 2013;Giuliani and Castelletti, 2013;Marques and Tilmant, 2013). In anticipatory water management, numerical weather forecasts are combined with simulation-optimization models to take operational actions before an event occurs (e.g.…”

Participated Planning of Large Water Infrastructures through Virtual Prototyping Technologies

“…The Zambezi River Basin is the fourth largest basin of Africa with an area of 1.32 million km 2 shared by eight countries (Angola, Botswana, Malawi, Mozambique, Namibia, Tanzania, Zambia and Zimbabwe) and populated by almost 40 million inhabitants. The existing reservoirs in the basin, which account for 5000 MW of installed hydropower generation capacity, are mainly operated for hydropower production, with considerable negative effects on the aquatic ecosystem in the Zambezi delta due to the alteration of the natural flow regime [56]. The economic development of the riparian countries is triggering major hydropower expansion, which is expected to increase the average energy production from 30,000 to around 60,000 GWh/year through the extension of existing facilities and the addition of new infrastructures.…”

Hydroeconomic Models as Decision Support Tools for Conjunctive Management of Surface and Groundwater

“…Linked groundwater models and surface water simulation can now be linked to single or multi-objective global search algorithms (Reed et al 2013;Matrosov et al 2015); this new way to seek efficient solutions opens up many possibilities, including simultaneously considering non-economic objectives. Recent efforts (Yang et al 2009;Giuliani and Castelletti 2013;Erfani et al 2013) to move beyond deterministic optimization to represent more realistic behavioral modeling of water users are relevant here. Many optimization modeling efforts reviewed in the paper apply to situations where water markets are relevant; where this is not the case, different computational technologies may be appropriate.…”