2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-014-0726-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the validity of single-item life satisfaction measures: results from three large samples

Abstract: Purpose-The present paper assessed the validity of single-item life satisfaction measures by comparing single-item measures to the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) -a more psychometrically established measure. Washington (N=13,064) and Oregon (N=2,277) recruited by the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) and a representative German sample (N=1,312) recruited by the Germany Socio-Economic Panel (GSOEP) were included in the present analyses. Single-item life satisfaction measures and the SWLS… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
553
2
14

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 723 publications
(583 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
14
553
2
14
Order By: Relevance
“…Additional concerns can be raised about the psychometric properties of single-item life satisfaction and happiness measures which were used instead of multi-item scales, such as the Satisfaction with Life Scale [71] and Positive and Negative Affect Schedule scale [72]. Published studies do provide support for the validity of single-item measure of life satisfaction [73,74] though longer scales may provide multidimensional assessment or higher internal consistencies. Future research should include longitudinal approach, with inclusion of objective measures, for example the level of stress at work, peer reports of ways to cope with negative feelings, as well as the specific measures of positive and negative emotions for measuring affective component of well-being.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional concerns can be raised about the psychometric properties of single-item life satisfaction and happiness measures which were used instead of multi-item scales, such as the Satisfaction with Life Scale [71] and Positive and Negative Affect Schedule scale [72]. Published studies do provide support for the validity of single-item measure of life satisfaction [73,74] though longer scales may provide multidimensional assessment or higher internal consistencies. Future research should include longitudinal approach, with inclusion of objective measures, for example the level of stress at work, peer reports of ways to cope with negative feelings, as well as the specific measures of positive and negative emotions for measuring affective component of well-being.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, only two items (global occupational satisfaction and general health) were used for assessing criterion validity in the present study, which might be regarded a weakness, although single-item questions are supported in research (Cheung & Lucas, 2014;Yohannes et al, 2011). A possibility in future studies aiming at further psychometric evaluation of the SDO-13 is to add other instruments, such as the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) (Law et al, 1998a).…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Third, we measured parental satisfaction using a single item. Research has indicated that single-item measures can be almost as effective, especially when the construct is unambiguous, as multiple items (e.g., Cheung and Lucas, 2014). For a complex rather than straightforward construct like parental satisfaction, however, multiple-item scales if constructed appropriately might be better than a single-item measure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%