2014
DOI: 10.1163/19426720-02004005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the UN Security Council: A Concert Perspective

Abstract: This article distinguishes between the UN Security Council's "governance" and "concert" functions and argues that the latter is important in assessing the body's diplomatic value. It presents data suggesting that serving together on the Council deepens diplomatic linkages between permanent members. It also argues that Council membership may offer several benefits for managing relations between the permanent members. Specifically, the Council provides a mechanism through which permanent members have slowed the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As long as this configuration contains persistent elements of heterogeneity, it gives a strong caution against another strand of views on the council, namely, seeing too much unity, autonomy, or even agency in the working of this body [3,8,9]. On the other hand, it neither implies that the council has been losing a foundation for serving some of its crucial functions, whether the collective legitimization of the use of force, great-power concert, or other governance functions, such as deploying peacekeepers [58][59][60]. Despite frequent suggestions to the contrary, the durable nature of a certain degree of accord among powerful members of the council still allows cautious optimism for its continued relevance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As long as this configuration contains persistent elements of heterogeneity, it gives a strong caution against another strand of views on the council, namely, seeing too much unity, autonomy, or even agency in the working of this body [3,8,9]. On the other hand, it neither implies that the council has been losing a foundation for serving some of its crucial functions, whether the collective legitimization of the use of force, great-power concert, or other governance functions, such as deploying peacekeepers [58][59][60]. Despite frequent suggestions to the contrary, the durable nature of a certain degree of accord among powerful members of the council still allows cautious optimism for its continued relevance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, there has never been experienced a war among the P5 for more than seventy years (Bosco, 2014). With respect to this relatively peaceful relationship, Hobbes explanation in the De Cive is meaningful:…”
Section: Contemporary World Order and Realist Explanationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been a key factor in maintaining a concert of interest among the most powerful nations. 7 Conflicts of interest between the P5 often paralyzed the Council during the Cold War and have also been the cause of various deadlocks in this century. However, the Council's workload has transformed during the last quarter century.…”
Section: Restructuring Permanent Membership: a Task For Sisyphusmentioning
confidence: 99%