2016
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the Spatial Variability of Alfalfa Yield Using Satellite Imagery and Ground-Based Data

Abstract: Understanding the temporal and spatial variability in a crop yield is viewed as one of the key steps in the implementation of precision agriculture practices. Therefore, a study on a center pivot irrigated 23.5 ha field in Saudi Arabia was conducted to assess the variability in alfalfa yield using Landsat-8 imagery and a hay yield monitor data. In addition, the study was designed to also explore the potential of predicting the alfalfa yield using vegetation indices. A calibrated yield monitor mounted on a larg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(32 reference statements)
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present review highlighted that, to date, studies on EWE effects on agricultural crops using remote and proximal sensing technologies are lacking, as compared to other methodologies, i.e., process-based modeling, field ecophysiological measurements and simulation scenarios. Remote and proximal sensing methodologies are playing an increasingly important role in the agriculture sector [49,50], and their application to the topic of EWE will need to be enlarged. Furthermore, as already stressed by other authors [51][52][53] this manuscript showed that there is a serious concern for food security and economic losses due to EWE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present review highlighted that, to date, studies on EWE effects on agricultural crops using remote and proximal sensing technologies are lacking, as compared to other methodologies, i.e., process-based modeling, field ecophysiological measurements and simulation scenarios. Remote and proximal sensing methodologies are playing an increasingly important role in the agriculture sector [49,50], and their application to the topic of EWE will need to be enlarged. Furthermore, as already stressed by other authors [51][52][53] this manuscript showed that there is a serious concern for food security and economic losses due to EWE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the study region, the alfalfa crop is usually cultivated for 2 years, with, on average, a cutting each 30-35 days during summer periods and every 45-60 days during winter periods. The mean alfalfa hay yield for each cut is estimated to be 2.0-3.0 kg ha −1 during winter and 4.0-5.0 kg ha −1 during spring or summer periods (Kayad et al, 2016).…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the availability of crop yield monitoring systems mounted to harvesters can provide yield maps but obviously only at the end of the season. Therefore, the rapid development in RS and the need for crop yield monitoring and prediction attracts the attention of many researchers to investigate within-field variability through satellite and aerial RS data [15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large number of VIs have been developed to describe crop growth and subsequently yield. Some well-known ones are the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index (SAVI), Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI), Green Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (GNDVI), Green Atmospherically Resistant Vegetation Index (GARVI), and Normalized Difference red edge (NDRE) [16,[28][29][30][31][32]. Specific modifications by differential weighting of some bands (in particular of the near-infrared range) have been applied to provide specific indices for crop yield monitoring, like the Wide Dynamic Range Vegetation Index (WDRVI) [33,34] and the Green Chlorophyll Vegetation Index (GCVI) [35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation