Assessing the Socio-economic Impacts of the Framework Programme

Georghiou, Luke; Rigby, John; Cameron, Hugh; Vonortas, Nick; Prastacos, Gregory P.; Spanos, Yiannis E.; Kuhlmann, Stefan; Heinze, Thomas; Bach, Laurent; Cohendet, Patrick; Ledoux, Marc; Matt, Mireille; Polt, Wolfgang; Schibany, Andreas; Fritz, Oliver; Nyiri, Lajos; Havas, Attila; Guy, Ken

doi:10.22163/fteval.2002.245

Cited by 29 publications

(22 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Attempts to establish true net impacts therefore must invoke hypothetical and counterfactual constructions-to focus on what might have happened without the programme. Despite the difficulty of carrying through such an aim, it is essential to focus on additionally or net programme impact to obtain any sense and measure of programme action [35] (p. 220).…”

Section: The Focus Of the Papermentioning

confidence: 99%

The Socio-Economic Evaluation of a European Project: The DIYLab Case

Sáncho-Gil¹,

Rivera-Vargas²

2016

Informatics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper builds on the results of a 3-year long European project, the main aim of which was to deeply and sustainably transform teaching and learning practice in primary and secondary schools and higher education, by introducing Do it Yourself (DIY) philosophy in order to expand digital competence and foster students' agency and collaborative learning. Three universities and three primary and secondary schools have been involved in a Collaborative Action Research (CAR) process in order to analyse their current institutional context and perceive needs, strengths and weaknesses; to undertake professional development activities and the design of DIYLabs; implement DIYLabs in the selected courses; and reflect upon ways of improving the institution's performance. This paper offers a global vision of the research and implementation processes and the results achieved, from the perspective of the socio-economic dimensions involved in a project aiming to make a difference in teaching and learning to meet the challenges of a society highly permeated by digital technology (DT).

show abstract

Section: The Focus Of the Papermentioning

confidence: 99%

The Socio-Economic Evaluation of a European Project: The DIYLab Case

Sáncho-Gil¹,

Rivera-Vargas²

2016

Informatics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In the learning processes literature (Bandelow, 2003;Georghiou et al, 2002;Kissling-Näf and Knoepfel, 1998), two main categories of external factors crucial for the production of outputs or newly introduced ecosystem g&s are mentioned: market developments and political regulation.…”

Section: Impulses and Factors For Learning Activities Within Forestrymentioning

confidence: 99%

How and why forest managers adapt to socio-economic changes: A case study analysis in Swiss forest enterprises

Ingold¹,

Zimmermann²

2011

Forest Policy and Economics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…• make difficult choices in the allocation of scarce resources for the funding of science and technology; • integrate "classical" research and innovation policy initiatives with broader socioeconomic targets, such as reducing unemployment, fostering the social inclusion of less favoured societal groups and regions (as claimed in particular by the 5 th Framework Programme of the European Commission), and reconciling innovation policy with a sustainable development of our natural environment as well as a careful use of natural resources (Georghiou/Rigby 2002;Kuhlmann/Meyer-Krahmer 2001, Airaghi et al 1999.…”

Section: Policymaking In 'Systems Of Innovation'mentioning

confidence: 99%