1993
DOI: 10.1093/forestry/66.3.249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Assessing the Risk of Snow and Wind Damage from Tree Physical Characteristics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
35
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies on cultivated stands indicate either an increased risk of damage as the density increases, e.g. in Pinus radiata [11], Pinus sylvestris [56] and Picea abies [1], attributed to the increase of H/D ratio, or a reduced risk as in Picea sitchensis on a peaty gley soil [9]. However, Gardiner et al [21] argue that theses studies did not consider that the wind loading on trees at wider spacing is higher and leads the trees to overturn rather than to break.…”
Section: Stand Density and The Damping Stand Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies on cultivated stands indicate either an increased risk of damage as the density increases, e.g. in Pinus radiata [11], Pinus sylvestris [56] and Picea abies [1], attributed to the increase of H/D ratio, or a reduced risk as in Picea sitchensis on a peaty gley soil [9]. However, Gardiner et al [21] argue that theses studies did not consider that the wind loading on trees at wider spacing is higher and leads the trees to overturn rather than to break.…”
Section: Stand Density and The Damping Stand Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tree and stand characteristics (e.g., crown type, stem taper and strength and stand density) control the resistance of trees to snow, and some tree species are thus more vulnerable to snow damage than others (Valinger et al 1993;Nykänen et al 1997;Peltola et al 1997Peltola et al , 1999Fridman 1997, 1999;Päätalo 2000). For example, Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interpretation keys, largely based on such information, have been proposed for some parts of Canada but they either are not adapted for balsam fir or do not take into account the whole set of influential factors (Meades and Moore 1989, Racey et al 1989, Zelazny et al 1989, Stathers et al 1994, Mitchell 1995. Empirical models based on observed damage have been developed elsewhere but are not calibrated for balsam fir (Valinger et al 1993, Valinger andFridman 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%